These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30276693)

  • 41. Assessment of methane production from shredder waste in landfills: The influence of temperature, moisture and metals.
    Fathi Aghdam E; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():226-237. PubMed ID: 27912989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Does vegetation affect the methane oxidation efficiency of passive biosystems?
    Ndanga ÉM; Bradley RL; Cabral AR
    Waste Manag; 2015 Apr; 38():240-9. PubMed ID: 25690413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Methane emissions from Icelandic landfills - A comparison between measured and modelled emissions.
    Scheutz C; Kjeld A; Fredenslund AM
    Waste Manag; 2022 Feb; 139():136-145. PubMed ID: 34968899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Methane emissions from MBT landfills.
    Heyer KU; Hupe K; Stegmann R
    Waste Manag; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1853-60. PubMed ID: 23756351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microbial oxidation of methane from old landfills in biofilters.
    Streese J; Stegmann R
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(7):573-80. PubMed ID: 12957152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Methane oxidation in a landfill biowindow under wide seasonally fluctuating climatic conditions.
    Berenjkar P; Sparling R; Lozecznik S; Yuan Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(17):24623-24638. PubMed ID: 34825333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: Performance of various landfill gas emission models.
    Gollapalli M; Kota SH
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():174-180. PubMed ID: 29175479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Screening methane-oxidizing bacteria from municipal solid waste landfills and simulating their effects on methane and ammonia reduction.
    Pan J; Wang X; Cao A; Zhao G; Zhou C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(36):37082-37091. PubMed ID: 31745784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biofiltration for mitigation of methane emission from animal husbandry.
    Melse RW; Van der Werf AW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jul; 39(14):5460-8. PubMed ID: 16082981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Model-based interpretation of methane oxidation and respiration processes in landfill biocovers: 3-D simulation of laboratory and pilot experiments.
    Ahmadi N; Mosthaf K; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P; Rolle M
    Waste Manag; 2020 May; 108():160-171. PubMed ID: 32353781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Identifying the limitations of conventional biofiltration of diffuse methane emissions at long-term operation.
    Gómez-Cuervo S; Hernández J; Omil F
    Environ Technol; 2016 Aug; 37(15):1947-58. PubMed ID: 26708417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Methane oxidation in a boreal climate in an experimental landfill cover composed from mechanically-biologically treated waste.
    Einola JK; Sormunen KM; Rintala JA
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 407(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 18823644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of capillary barrier effect on biogas distribution at the base of passive methane oxidation biosystems: Parametric study.
    Ahoughalandari B; Cabral AR
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():172-187. PubMed ID: 27931937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inhibitory effects of acidic pH and confounding effects of moisture content on methane biofiltration.
    Barzgar S; Hettiaratchi JP; Pearse L; Kumar S
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Dec; 245(Pt A):633-640. PubMed ID: 28910651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Seasonal greenhouse gas emissions (methane, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide) from engineered landfills: daily, intermediate, and final California cover soils.
    Bogner JE; Spokas KA; Chanton JP
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):1010-20. PubMed ID: 21546687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Methane flux and oxidation at two types of intermediate landfill covers.
    Abichou T; Chanton J; Powelson D; Fleiger J; Escoriaza S; Lei Y; Stern J
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1305-12. PubMed ID: 16426833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hotspot detection and spatial distribution of methane emissions from landfills by a surface probe method.
    Gonzalez-Valencia R; Magana-Rodriguez F; Cristóbal J; Thalasso F
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():299-305. PubMed ID: 26973281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of earthworm cast and powdered activated carbon on methane removal capacity of landfill cover soils.
    Park S; Lee I; Cho C; Sung K
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(6):1117-23. PubMed ID: 17764722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Control of dissolved CH
    Huete A; de Los Cobos-Vasconcelos D; Gómez-Borraz T; Morgan-Sagastume JM; Noyola A
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 216():383-391. PubMed ID: 28701283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A simple and rapid in situ method for measuring landfill gas emissions and methane oxidation rates in landfill covers.
    Zhan LT; Wu T; Feng S; Lan JW; Chen YM
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 May; 38(5):588-593. PubMed ID: 31856695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.