These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30276905)
1. The impact of blind peer review (team reading) of equivocal/abnormal Papanicolaou smears on inter-reader agreement. Placidi A; Giorgi Rossi P Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):105-108. PubMed ID: 30276905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control. Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A quality control system involving peer review of abnormal cervical smears. Palli D; Confortini M; Biggeri A; Russo A; Cariaggi P; Carozzi F; Minuti PA Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8453014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme. Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology. Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False-Negative Rate of Papanicolaou Testing: A National Survey from the Thai Society of Cytology. Koonmee S; Bychkov A; Shuangshoti S; Bhummichitra K; Himakhun W; Karalak A; Rangdaeng S Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(6):434-440. PubMed ID: 28738387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical Cancer Screening: More Choices in 2019. Sawaya GF; Smith-McCune K; Kuppermann M JAMA; 2019 May; 321(20):2018-2019. PubMed ID: 31135834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of human papillomavirus DNA testing to compare equivocal cervical cytologic interpretations in the United States, Scandinavia, and the United Kingdom. Scott DR; Hagmar B; Maddox P; Hjerpe A; Dillner J; Cuzick J; Sherman ME; Stoler MH; Kurman RJ; Kiviat NB; Manos MM; Schiffman M Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11836698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A selection of monitoring parameters for gynecologic cytology-Beacons of light for quality assurance. Auger M Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jan; 122(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 24203215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the Validity and Reproducibility of the Pap Smear in Mexico: Necessity of a Paradigm Shift. Yunes-Díaz E; Ruiz PA; Lazcano-Ponce E Arch Med Res; 2015 May; 46(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 26054968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan. Osamura RY Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology. Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait. Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening. Bergeron C; Masseroli M; Ghezi A; Lemarie A; Mango L; Koss LG Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories. Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Nieminen P; Suwanrungraung K; Kamsa-ard S; Parkin DM Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 16101335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]