These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30278117)

  • 1. Exogenous attention and memory for faces following contextual behavioral immune system activation.
    Magalhães AC; Pandeirada JNS; Fernandes NL; Soares SC
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 59(6):586-593. PubMed ID: 30278117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential impact of disfiguring facial features on overt and covert attention.
    Boutsen L; Pearson NA; Jüttner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():122-134. PubMed ID: 30103152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.
    Hagemann J; Straube T; Schulz C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():136-49. PubMed ID: 26878979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once.
    Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016; 24(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 25621412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gamma-band activity reflects attentional guidance by facial expression.
    Müsch K; Siegel M; Engel AK; Schneider TR
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():1142-1148. PubMed ID: 27637862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Hirai M; Muramatsu Y; Mizuno S; Kurahashi N; Kurahashi H; Nakamura M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):969-81. PubMed ID: 27476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of face and non-face stimuli in autistic spectrum disorder.
    Arkush L; Smith-Collins AP; Fiorentini C; Skuse DH
    Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 23894016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face value: testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition.
    Tupper N; Sauer JD; Sauerland M; Fu I; Hope L
    Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1436-1449. PubMed ID: 29932823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional contexts modulate intentional memory suppression of neutral faces: Insights from ERPs.
    Pierguidi L; Righi S; Gronchi G; Marzi T; Caharel S; Giovannelli F; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():1-13. PubMed ID: 27234617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A facilitative effect of negative affective valence on working memory.
    Gotoh F; Kikuchi T; Olofsson U
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 20132459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of facial attractiveness on personality stimuli in an implicit priming task: an ERP study.
    Zhang Y; Zheng M; Wang X
    Neurol Res; 2016 Aug; 38(8):685-91. PubMed ID: 27268219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target object moderation of attentional orienting by gazes or arrows.
    Yan T; Zhao S; Uono S; Bi X; Tian A; Yoshimura S; Toichi M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2373-2382. PubMed ID: 27506428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?
    Silvert L; Funes MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():124-34. PubMed ID: 26642227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.
    Rohr M; Tröger J; Michely N; Uhde A; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 28213830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Look on the bright side: Positivity bias modulates interference effects in the simon task.
    Schlaghecken F; Blagrove E; Mantantzis K; Maylor EA; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jun; 146(6):763-770. PubMed ID: 28425746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How acute stress may enhance subsequent memory for threat stimuli outside the focus of attention: DLPFC-amygdala decoupling.
    Luo Y; Fernández G; Hermans E; Vogel S; Zhang Y; Li H; Klumpers F
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 171():311-322. PubMed ID: 29329979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors.
    Retell JD; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1340-65. PubMed ID: 26299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotion-attention interactions in recognition memory for distractor faces.
    Srinivasan N; Gupta R
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 20364896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.