These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30278213)

  • 1. Tailored meta-analysis: an investigation of the correlation between the test positive rate and prevalence.
    Willis BH; Coomar D; Baragilly M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():1-9. PubMed ID: 30278213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the test's accuracy in my practice population? Tailored meta-analysis provides a plausible estimate.
    Willis BH; Hyde CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 68(8):847-54. PubMed ID: 25479685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High resolution T association tests of complex diseases based on family data.
    Fan R; Knapp M; Wjst M; Zhao C; Xiong M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):187-208. PubMed ID: 15720300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating a test's accuracy using tailored meta-analysis-How setting-specific data may aid study selection.
    Willis BH; Hyde CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 24447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring the statistical validity of summary meta-analysis and meta-regression results for use in clinical practice.
    Willis BH; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3283-3301. PubMed ID: 28620945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On estimating a constrained bivariate random effects model for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies.
    Baragilly M; Willis BH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):287-299. PubMed ID: 34994667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Zapf A; Hoyer A; Kramer K; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3831-41. PubMed ID: 26174020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
    Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
    Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1088-97. PubMed ID: 22742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Chu H; Guo H
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):201-3. PubMed ID: 19039031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analyzing dependent correlations with correction for artifacts that multiplicatively attenuate the true correlation.
    Cheung SF; Chan DK; Sun RW
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):793-810. PubMed ID: 30136040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A regularized Hotelling's
    Chen LS; Paul D; Prentice RL; Wang P
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2011 Dec; 106(496):1345-1360. PubMed ID: 23997374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalized Hotelling's test for paired compositional data with application to human microbiome studies.
    Zhao N; Zhan X; Guthrie KA; Mitchell CM; Larson J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):459-469. PubMed ID: 29737047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the correction of the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic if nuisance parameters are estimated based on an external source.
    Jonker M; Van der Vaart A
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 24837490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random-effects meta-analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models.
    Wynants L; Riley RD; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):2034-2052. PubMed ID: 29575170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates.
    Ateş C; Kaymaz Ö; Kale HE; Tekindal MA
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():2173638. PubMed ID: 31396289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.