400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30278966)
1. Cost-effectiveness of surgeon performed intraoperative specimen ink in breast conservation surgery.
Van Den Bruele AB; Jasra B; Smotherman C; Crandall M; Samiian L
J Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 231():441-447. PubMed ID: 30278966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of intraoperative specimen inking on lumpectomy re-excision rates.
Singh M; Singh G; Hogan KT; Atkins KA; Schroen AT
World J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 8():4. PubMed ID: 20082705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Single institution's randomized double-armed prospective study of lumpectomy margins with adjunctive use of the MarginProbe in nonpalpable breast cancers.
Geha RC; Taback B; Cadena L; Borden B; Feldman S
Breast J; 2020 Nov; 26(11):2157-2162. PubMed ID: 32772474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins.
Merrill AL; Tang R; Plichta JK; Rai U; Coopey SB; McEvoy MP; Hughes KS; Specht MC; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(11):3453-3458. PubMed ID: 27207096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Margins in breast conserving surgery: The financial cost & potential savings associated with the new margin guidelines.
Singer L; Brown E; Lanni T
Breast; 2016 Aug; 28():1-4. PubMed ID: 27161409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: A cost analysis using a decision tree model.
Abe SE; Hill JS; Han Y; Walsh K; Symanowski JT; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Flippo-Morton T; Sarantou T; Forster M; White RL
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 26374088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can Selective Image-Guided Intraoperative Margin Resection Improve Re-Excision Rates after Lumpectomy in Ductal Carcinoma
Gray K; Ayabe R; Shover A; Moazzez A; Ozao-Choy J; Dauphine C
Am Surg; 2018 Oct; 84(10):1580-1583. PubMed ID: 30747673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation.
DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Dong W; Smith BD; Moran MS; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Kuerer HM; Lucci A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2965-2974. PubMed ID: 29987598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery.
Philpott A; Wong J; Elder K; Gorelik A; Mann GB; Skandarajah A
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):922-927. PubMed ID: 29763991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.
Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery?
Mamtani A; Romanoff A; Baser R; Vincent A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 32500343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying Factors and Techniques to Decrease the Positive Margin Rate in Partial Mastectomies: Have We Missed the Mark?
Edwards SB; Leitman IM; Wengrofsky AJ; Giddins MJ; Harris E; Mills CB; Fukuhara S; Cassaro S
Breast J; 2016 May; 22(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 26854189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
