These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30279088)

  • 1. Agreement between lens thickness measurements by ultrasound immersion biometry and optical biometry.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Schiano-Lomoriello D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 30279088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates With Biometers Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared to Partial-Coherence Interferometry and Optical Low-Coherence Interferometry.
    McAlinden C; Wang Q; Gao R; Zhao W; Yu A; Li Y; Guo Y; Huang J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 173():64-69. PubMed ID: 27664702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers.
    Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
    An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers.
    Ang RET; Estolano BL; Luz PHC; Umali MIN; Araneta MMQ; Cruz EM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):410. PubMed ID: 39300358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
    Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Aramberri J; Huang J; Barboni P
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):690-695. PubMed ID: 28991337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
    Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.
    Hashemi H; Sardari S; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7748. PubMed ID: 35546610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.