These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30280085)

  • 1. Spinal Stenosis in the Absence of Spondylolisthesis: Can Interlaminar Stabilization at Single and Multi-levels Provide Sustainable Relief?
    Abjornson C; Yoon BV; Callanan T; Shein D; Grinberg S; Cammisa FP
    Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Jan; 12(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 30280085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment.
    Bae HW; Lauryssen C; Maislin G; Leary S; Musacchio MJ
    Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():15. PubMed ID: 26056630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
    Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interlaminar stabilization for spinal stenosis in the Medicare population.
    Grinberg SZ; Simon RB; Dowe C; Brecevich AT; Cammisa FP; Abjornson C
    Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):1948-1959. PubMed ID: 32659365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
    Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 2-Level Experience of Interlaminar Stabilization: 5-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Experience Compared to Fusion for the Sustainable Management of Spinal Stenosis.
    Simon RB; Dowe C; Grinberg S; Cammisa FP; Abjornson C
    Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Aug; 12(4):419-427. PubMed ID: 30276101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5-year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Musacchio MJ; Lauryssen C; Davis RJ; Bae HW; Peloza JH; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Leary S
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():6. PubMed ID: 26913226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-Year Follow-up of the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization vs Instrumented Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Stenosis.
    Bae HW; Davis RJ; Lauryssen C; Leary S; Maislin G; Musacchio MJ
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Aug; 79(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 27050538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ahmad S; Hamad A; Bhalla A; Turner S; Balain B; Jaffray D
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):414-419. PubMed ID: 27272494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.
    Schaeren S; Broger I; Jeanneret B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):E636-42. PubMed ID: 18708915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study.
    Inose H; Kato T; Yuasa M; Yamada T; Maehara H; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Kawabata S; Okawa A
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Aug; 31(7):E347-E352. PubMed ID: 29877872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis.
    Lu T; Lu Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jul; 15(1):291. PubMed ID: 32727615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
    Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.