BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30281698)

  • 21. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between laparoscopic and robotic surgery for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer using indocyanine green and near infra-red fluorescence imaging.
    Chaowawanit W; Campbell V; Wilson E; Chetty N; Perrin L; Jagasia N; Barry S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):642-646. PubMed ID: 32812452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implementing robotic surgery for uterine cancer in the United States: Better outcomes without increased costs.
    Casarin J; Song C; Multinu F; Cappuccio S; Liu E; Butler KA; Glaser GE; Cliby WA; Langstraat CL; Ghezzi F; Fu AZ; Mariani A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 156(2):451-458. PubMed ID: 31780236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
    Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perioperative Recovery and Narcotic Use in Laparoscopic versus Robotic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.
    Crane EK; Brown J; Lehman A; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1898-1902. PubMed ID: 33965644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
    Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Souche R; Herrero A; Bourel G; Chauvat J; Pirlet I; Guillon F; Nocca D; Borie F; Mercier G; Fabre JM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3562-3569. PubMed ID: 29396754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
    Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.
    Chan JK; Gardner AB; Taylor K; Thompson CA; Blansit K; Yu X; Kapp DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 26363212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
    Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs.
    Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Caruso R; Malavé L; Ferri V; Nuñez J; Ruiz-Ocaña A; Jorge E; Lazzaro S; Kalivaci D; Quijano Y; Vicente E
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1423-1429. PubMed ID: 28791457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications.
    Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Dossa F; Liani V; Kaur Y; Acuna SA; Robertson D; Satkunaratnam A; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Baxter NN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):410-428.e19. PubMed ID: 31082383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
    Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
    Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
    Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
    Arghami A; Dy BM; Bingener J; Osborn J; Richards ML
    JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00218. PubMed ID: 25848182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher.
    Kosa SD; Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Abitbol J; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Renkosinski B; Gien LT; Bernardini MQ
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):747-753. PubMed ID: 34904716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.