145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30281715)
21. [Access to early breast cancer diagnosis in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: an analysis of data from the Health Information System].
Azevedo E Silva G; Bustamante-Teixeira MT; Aquino EM; Tomazelli JG; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jul; 30(7):1537-50. PubMed ID: 25166949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interval cancer rates in the Irish national breast screening programme.
O'Brien KM; Dwane F; Kelleher T; Sharp L; Comber H
J Med Screen; 2015 Sep; 22(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 25917389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service between 2008 and 2017.
Rodrigues DCN; Freitas-Junior R; Rahal RMS; da Silveira Corrêa R; Gouveia PA; Peixoto JE; Martins E; Soares LR
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):959. PubMed ID: 31319826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcome of breast cancer screening: a Lebanese single institution experience.
Kourie HR; Daher A; Matar D; Antoun J; Salloum L; Kattan J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9471-3. PubMed ID: 25422257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The eternal problem of false positives in mammography screening].
Seguí Díaz M
Semergen; 2017 Mar; 43(2):151-153. PubMed ID: 27117788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast cancer screening in young women.
Desreux JAC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():208-211. PubMed ID: 29804884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.
Berg WA; Bandos AI; Mendelson EB; Lehrer D; Jong RA; Pisano ED
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 26712110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness].
Autier P
Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 24579331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Training Community Health Workers to promote breast cancer screening in Brazil.
Bittencourt L; Scarinci IC
Health Promot Int; 2019 Feb; 34(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 29036489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early diagnosis and detection of breast cancer.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Milenkovic A; Stojanov D
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):729-759. PubMed ID: 30124455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
