133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30282097)
1. All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Total Knee Replacement: Early Failures.
Alhifzi ZS; Khoja YT; Wood GC
J Knee Surg; 2019 Sep; 32(9):919-923. PubMed ID: 30282097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components-An Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.
Gudnason A; Hailer NP; W-Dahl A; Sundberg M; Robertsson O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 24951734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-Term Results of Total Knee Replacement Using P.F.C. Sigma System with an All-Polyethylene Tibial Component].
Nachtnebl L; Tomáš T; Apostolopoulos V; Pazourek L; Mahdal M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2021; 88(6):412-417. PubMed ID: 34998443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components are equivalent with BMI of less than 37.5.
Toman J; Iorio R; Healy WL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 21997784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal-Backed Tibial Components Do Not Reduce Risk of Early Aseptic Loosening in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Costa GG; Lo Presti M; Grassi A; Agrò G; Cialdella S; Mosca M; Caravelli S; Zaffagnini S
J Knee Surg; 2020 Feb; 33(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 30650439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision of Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Unicompartmental Implant (Metal-Backed vs All-Polyethylene) Impact the Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Scott CEH; Powell-Bowns MFR; MacDonald DJ; Simpson PM; Wade FA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 29525342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
Longo UG; Ciuffreda M; D'Andrea V; Mannering N; Locher J; Denaro V
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3620-3636. PubMed ID: 27209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All-polyethylene tibial components in modern total knee arthroplasty.
Browne JA; Gall Sims SE; Giuseffi SA; Trousdale RT
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2011 Sep; 19(9):527-35. PubMed ID: 21885698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal or Modularity: Why Do Metal-Backed Tibias Have Inferior Outcomes to All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Patients With Osteoarthritis.
Houdek MT; Watts CD; Wyles CC; Martin JR; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):836-842. PubMed ID: 27816367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cemented all-polyethylene and metal-backed polyethylene tibial components used for primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving 1798 primary total knee implants.
Voigt J; Mosier M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 93(19):1790-8. PubMed ID: 22005864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All-polyethylene tibial components are not inferior to metal-backed tibial components in long-term follow-up of knee arthroplasties.
Yassin M; Garti A; Weissbrot M; Ashkenazi U; Khatib M; Robinson D
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1087-91. PubMed ID: 26006786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Meta-Analysis Comparing All-Polyethylene Tibial Component to Metal-Backed Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Assessing Survivorship and Functional Outcomes.
Voss B; El-Othmani MM; Schnur AK; Botchway A; Mihalko WM; Saleh KJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2628-2636. PubMed ID: 27538714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. All-Polyethylene versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
AbuMoussa S; White CC; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Knee Surg; 2019 Aug; 32(8):714-718. PubMed ID: 30959547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monoblock all-polyethylene tibial components have a lower risk of early revision than metal-backed modular components.
Mohan V; Inacio MC; Namba RS; Sheth D; Paxton EW
Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):530-6. PubMed ID: 24237424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modular Metal-Backed Tibial Components Provide Minimal Mid-Term Survivorship Benefits Despite Increased Cost and Frequency of Use: A Retrospective Review of the American Joint Replacement Registry Database.
Kelley B; Mullen K; De A; Sassoon A
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1570-1574.e1. PubMed ID: 35189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Survivorship of Different Tibial Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Sierra RJ; Schleck CD; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jul; 96(14):e121. PubMed ID: 25031383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total knee arthroplasty with 4.4 mm of tibial polyethylene an update.
Meding JB; Wing JT; Ritter MA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):772-4. PubMed ID: 19625160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression.
Nouta KA; Verra WC; Pijls BG; Schoones JW; Nelissen RG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3549-59. PubMed ID: 22972656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. All-Polyethylene Tibial Components: An Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Infection.
Houdek MT; Wagner ER; Wyles CC; Watts CD; Cass JR; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1476-82. PubMed ID: 27067171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibias in megaprostheses of the distal femur.
Crosby SN; Polkowski GG; Schwartz HS; Shinar AA; Holt GE
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 20334995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
