179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30282676)
1. Can the completeness of radiological cancer staging reports be improved using proforma reporting? A prospective multicentre non-blinded interventional study across 21 centres in the UK.
Patel A; Rockall A; Guthrie A; Gleeson F; Worthy S; Grubnic S; Burling D; Allen C; Padhani A; Carey B; Cavanagh P; Peake MD; Brown G
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e018499. PubMed ID: 30282676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An audit comparing the reporting of staging MRI scans for rectal cancer with the London Cancer Alliance (LCA) guidelines.
Siddiqui MRS; Shanmuganandan AP; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Brown G; Abulafi AM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2093-2104. PubMed ID: 28947340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and implementation of a synoptic MRI report for preoperative staging of rectal cancer on a population-based level.
Kennedy ED; Milot L; Fruitman M; Al-Sukhni E; Heine G; Schmocker S; Brown G; McLeod RS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jun; 57(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 24807594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality.
Siriwardana PN; Pathmeswaran A; Hewavisenthi J; Deen KI
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):849-53. PubMed ID: 19740157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting.
Mathers ME; Shrimankar J; Scott DJ; Charlton FG; Griffith CD; Angus B
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 11577136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardised reports with a template format are superior to free text reports: the case for rectal cancer reporting in clinical practice.
Brown PJ; Rossington H; Taylor J; Lambregts DMJ; Morris E; West NP; Quirke P; Tolan D;
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):5121-5128. PubMed ID: 30796574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An audit of completeness of HIV clinical histories: before and after introduction of an HIV proforma.
Natha M; Sheehy C; Pollard M; Pakianathan M; Prime K
Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Feb; 19(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 18334070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Completeness of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery.
Kanters AE; Vu JV; Schuman AD; Van Wieren I; Duby A; Hardiman KM; Hendren SK
Am J Surg; 2020 Jul; 220(1):165-169. PubMed ID: 31630821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiology reporting of micturating cystourethrograms (MCUGs): What the paediatric urologists want to know.
Walsh C; Wessely K; De Caluwe D; Rahman N; Farrugia MK
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Dec; 16(6):790.e1-790.e6. PubMed ID: 33011087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the Quality of MRI Reports of Preoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: Effect of National Guidelines and Structured Reporting.
Tersteeg JJC; Gobardhan PD; Crolla RMPH; Kint PAM; Niers-Stobbe I; Boonman-de Winter LJM; Schreinemakers JMJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1240-1244. PubMed ID: 29570375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit to compare standards with minimum datasets.
King PM; Blazeby JM; Gupta J; Alderson D; Moorghen M
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 15220361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The surgical admission proforma: the impact on quality and completeness of surgical admission documentation.
Hannan E; Ahmad A; O'Brien A; Ramjit S; Mansoor S; Toomey D
Ir J Med Sci; 2021 Nov; 190(4):1547-1551. PubMed ID: 33464480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between a multicentre, collaborative, closed-loop audit assessing management of supracondylar fractures and the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma 11 (BOAST 11) guidelines.
Goodall R; Claireaux H; Hill J; Wilson E; Monsell F; Boast Collaborative ; Tarassoli P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Mar; 100-B(3):346-351. PubMed ID: 29589502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
