These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30283698)

  • 1. Lineages evolved under stronger sexual selection show superior ability to invade conspecific competitor populations.
    Godwin JL; Spurgin LG; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Lumley AJ; Chapman T; Gage MJG
    Evol Lett; 2018 Oct; 2(5):511-523. PubMed ID: 30283698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection protects against extinction.
    Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Kitson JJ; Spurgin LG; Morrison CA; Godwin JL; Dickinson ME; Martin OY; Emerson BC; Chapman T; Gage MJ
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7557):470-3. PubMed ID: 25985178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mating patterns influence vulnerability to the extinction vortex.
    Godwin JL; Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Gage MJG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Aug; 26(8):4226-4239. PubMed ID: 32558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Thilliez E; Arnqvist G; Berger D
    Evol Appl; 2019 Aug; 12(7):1371-1384. PubMed ID: 31417621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evolution exposes female and male responses to sexual selection and conflict in Tribolium castaneum.
    Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Martin OY; Lumley AJ; Emerson BC; Gage MJ
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):713-24. PubMed ID: 21091981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection on spontaneous mutations strengthens the between-sex genetic correlation for fitness.
    Allen SL; McGuigan K; Connallon T; Blows MW; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2017 Oct; 71(10):2398-2409. PubMed ID: 28722119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex-specific natural selection on SNPs in
    Delph LF; Brown KE; Ríos LD; Kelly JK
    Evol Lett; 2022 Aug; 6(4):308-318. PubMed ID: 35937470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.
    Hopkins BR; Perry JC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1426-1448. PubMed ID: 35249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental variance in male mating success modulates the positive versus negative impacts of sexual selection on genetic load.
    Tschol M; Reid JM; Bocedi G
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1242-1254. PubMed ID: 37497848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there genetic trade-offs between immune and reproductive investments in Tribolium castaneum?
    Hangartner S; Sbilordo SH; Michalczyk Ł; Gage MJ; Martin OY
    Infect Genet Evol; 2013 Oct; 19():45-50. PubMed ID: 23770144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of sexual selection on life-history traits: an experimental study on guppies.
    Pélabon C; Larsen LK; Bolstad GH; Viken Å; Fleming IA; Rosenqvist G
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Feb; 27(2):404-16. PubMed ID: 24417444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental removal of sexual selection leads to decreased investment in an immune component in female Tribolium castaneum.
    Hangartner S; Michalczyk Ł; Gage MJ; Martin OY
    Infect Genet Evol; 2015 Jul; 33():212-8. PubMed ID: 25958137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental evolution reveals that sperm competition intensity selects for longer, more costly sperm.
    Godwin JL; Vasudeva R; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Lumley AJ; Chapman T; Gage MJG
    Evol Lett; 2017 Jun; 1(2):102-113. PubMed ID: 30283643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does operational sex ratio influence relative strength of purging selection in males versus females?
    Plesnar-Bielak A; Sychta K; Gaczorek TS; Palka JK; Prus MA; Prokop ZM
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 31549754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male-benefit sexually antagonistic genotypes show elevated vulnerability to inbreeding.
    Grieshop K; Berger D; Arnqvist G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28606137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments.
    Becks L; Agrawal AF
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(5):e1001317. PubMed ID: 22563299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection for Male Weapons Boosts Female Fecundity, Eliminating Sexual Conflict in the Bulb Mite.
    Buzatto BA; Clark HL
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2311. PubMed ID: 32047190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do males pay for sex? Sex-specific selection coefficients suggest not.
    Prokop ZM; Prus MA; Gaczorek TS; Sychta K; Palka JK; Plesnar-Bielak A; Skarboń M
    Evolution; 2017 Mar; 71(3):650-661. PubMed ID: 27943275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.