These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30283984)

  • 1. Decoupled molecules with binding polynomials of bidegree (n, 2).
    Ren Y; Martini JWR; Torres J
    J Math Biol; 2019 Mar; 78(4):879-898. PubMed ID: 30283984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tinkering with Binding Polynomials in Isothermal Titration Calorimetry.
    Claveria-Gimeno R; Vega S; Abian O; Velazquez-Campoy A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1964():185-213. PubMed ID: 30929244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integral-valued polynomials over sets of algebraic integers of bounded degree.
    Peruginelli G
    J Number Theory; 2014 Apr; 137():241-255. PubMed ID: 26949270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Case for Algebraic Biology: from Research to Education.
    Macauley M; Youngs N
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Aug; 82(9):115. PubMed ID: 32816124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Symmetric Group-Based Models via Numerical Algebraic Geometry.
    Kosta D; Kubjas K
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):337-360. PubMed ID: 30357599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing protein-ligand binding modes with computational tools: the case of PDE4B.
    Çifci G; Aviyente V; Akten ED; Monard G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jun; 31(6):563-575. PubMed ID: 28534194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The binding capacity is a probability density function.
    Di Cera E; Chen ZQ
    Biophys J; 1993 Jul; 65(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 8369425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using competition assays to quantitatively model cooperative binding by transcription factors and other ligands.
    Peacock J; Jaynes JB
    Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2017 Nov; 1861(11 Pt A):2789-2801. PubMed ID: 28774855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receptor heterogeneity in optical biosensors.
    Evans RM; Edwards DA
    J Math Biol; 2018 Mar; 76(4):795-816. PubMed ID: 28707032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Location of zeros of Wiener and distance polynomials.
    Dehmer M; Ilić A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e28328. PubMed ID: 22438861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between zeros and factors of binding polynomials and cooperativity in protein-ligand binding.
    Briggs WE
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Jun; 114(4):605-14. PubMed ID: 4021509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chemometric analysis of ligand receptor complementarity: identifying Complementary Ligands Based on Receptor Information (CoLiBRI).
    Oloff S; Zhang S; Sukumar N; Breneman C; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):844-51. PubMed ID: 16563016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insights into Protein-Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods.
    Du X; Li Y; Xia YL; Ai SM; Liang J; Sang P; Ji XL; Liu SQ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 26821017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():383-98. PubMed ID: 25330972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligand-Binding Calculations with Metadynamics.
    Provasi D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():233-253. PubMed ID: 31396906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. aPPRove: An HMM-Based Method for Accurate Prediction of RNA-Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Binding Events.
    Harrison T; Ruiz J; Sloan DB; Ben-Hur A; Boucher C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160645. PubMed ID: 27560805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery.
    Balius TE; Fischer M; Stein RM; Adler TB; Nguyen CN; Cruz A; Gilson MK; Kurtzman T; Shoichet BK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(33):E6839-E6846. PubMed ID: 28760952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regions of multistationarity in cascades of Goldbeter-Koshland loops.
    Giaroli M; Bihan F; Dickenstein A
    J Math Biol; 2019 Mar; 78(4):1115-1145. PubMed ID: 30415316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of kinetic and thermodynamic ligand-binding parameters using computational strategies.
    Deganutti G; Moro S
    Future Med Chem; 2017 Apr; 9(5):507-523. PubMed ID: 28362130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.