These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30284273)
1. Long-Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant. Brkic FF; Riss D; Auinger A; Zoerner B; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Vyskocil E Laryngoscope; 2019 Feb; 129(2):477-481. PubMed ID: 30284273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer. Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window. Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data. Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses. Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative Estimation of the Coupling Efficiency and Clinical Outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge Active Middle Ear Implant Using Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements. Geiger U; Radeloff A; Hagen R; Cebulla M Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 28(3):553-559. PubMed ID: 31318578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss. Savaş VA; Gündüz B; Karamert R; Cevizci R; Düzlü M; Tutar H; Bayazit YA J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 26991874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window. Sprinzl GM; Schoerg P; Muck S; Jesenko M; Speiser S; Ploder M; Edlinger SH; Magele A Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1434-E1442. PubMed ID: 33210744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery. Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss. Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling. Olszewski L; Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2843-2849. PubMed ID: 28220497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active Middle Ear Implantation: Long-term Medical and Technical Follow-up, Implant Survival, and Complications. Zwartenkot JW; Mulder JJ; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun; 37(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 27023016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]