199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30284620)
1. Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.
Weiss C; Oppelt P; Mayer RB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 30284620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the Porter formula hold its promise? A weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses put to the test.
Weiss C; Enengl S; Enzelsberger SH; Mayer RB; Oppelt P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Jan; 301(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 31883045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.
Esinler D; Bircan O; Esin S; Sahin EG; Kandemir O; Yalvac S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia.
Hoopmann M; Abele H; Wagner N; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(4):204-13. PubMed ID: 20523027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound weight estimation of large fetuses.
Lindell G; Källén K; Maršál K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Oct; 91(10):1218-25. PubMed ID: 22762512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic weight estimation in fetal macrosomia: influence of the time interval between estimation and delivery.
Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Schneider M; Faschingbauer C; Schmid M; Mayr A; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Kehl S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 292(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25534163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas.
Faschingbauer F; Voigt F; Goecke TW; Siemer J; Beckmann MW; Yazdi B; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E62-E67. PubMed ID: 22179801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
Lindell G; Marsál K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of modified Hadlock formula for fetal macrosomia in women with gestational diabetes and pregnancy weight gain above recommended.
Lovrić B; Šijanović S; Lešin J; Juras J
J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):907-914. PubMed ID: 33861027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation within 14 days of delivery in a Jordanian population using Hadlock formula 1.
Basha AS; Abu-Khader IB; Qutishat RM; Amarin ZO
Med Princ Pract; 2012; 21(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 22286836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
