These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30284848)

  • 1. Current status of forensic lie detection with the comparison question technique: An update of the 2003 National Academy of Sciences report on polygraph testing.
    Iacono WG; Ben-Shakhar G
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):86-98. PubMed ID: 30284848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Credibility assessment: preliminary process theory, the polygraph process, and construct validity.
    Palmatier JJ; Rovner L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 24933412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polygraph Accuracy of Control Question Test in Criminal Cases.
    Sun ZY; Zhang F; Zhang FX; Luo R; Mao YY; Hu ZQ; Gu Y
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 35(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 31282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive and emotional aspects of polygraph diagnostic procedures: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Elaad E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 25093905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alice-in-Wonderland terminological usage in, and communicational concerns about, that peculiarly American flight of technological fancy. The CQT polygraph.
    Furedy JJ
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 1954164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science and the CQT polygraph. A theoretical critique.
    Saxe L
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 1954162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The protection of innocent suspects: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Vrij A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 25224520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Good intentions that fail to cope with the main point in CQT: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Ginton A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 25264350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Comparison Question Test versus the Concealed Information Test? That was the question in Japan: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Ogawa T; Matsuda I; Tsuneoka M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 25242502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trial by polygraph: reconsidering the use of the guilty knowledge technique in court.
    Ben-Shakhar G; Bar-Hillel M; Kremnitzer M
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Oct; 26(5):527-41. PubMed ID: 12412496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polygraph testing. DOE says fewer workers will face the machine.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5639):1456. PubMed ID: 12970530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary process theory does not validate the comparison question test: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Ben-Shakhar G; Gamer M; Iacono W; Meijer E; Verschuere B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 25151652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy rate of lie-detection in China: estimate the validity of CQT on field cases.
    Mao YY; Liang YD; Hu ZQ
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():104-10. PubMed ID: 25447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some elementary distinctions among, and comments concerning, the 'control' question 'test' (CQT) polygrapher's many problems: a reply to Honts, Kircher and Raskin.
    Furedy JJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 22(1-2):53-9. PubMed ID: 8799768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test.
    Lykken DT
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 1954161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polygraph. Council on Scientific Affairs.
    JAMA; 1986 Sep; 256(9):1172-5. PubMed ID: 3735653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment.
    Kokish R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):175-94. PubMed ID: 15308451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychology and the lie detector industry: A fifty-year perspective.
    Iacono WG
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108808. PubMed ID: 38718884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychophysiological detection of deception and Preliminary Process Theory: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Patnaik P; Kircher JC
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 25196828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.