These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30284889)

  • 1. A comprehensive method of single-case data analysis: Interrupted Time-Series Simulation (ITSSIM).
    Tarlow KR; Brossart DF
    Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Dec; 33(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 30284889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate models vs. accurate estimates: A simulation study of Bayesian single-case experimental designs.
    Natesan Batley P; Hedges LV
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1782-1798. PubMed ID: 33575987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation.
    Arend MG; Schäfer T
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 30265048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomization test wrapper for synthesizing single-case experiments using multilevel models: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Michiels B; Tanious R; De TK; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):654-666. PubMed ID: 31270794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Gradual Effects Model for Single-Case Designs.
    Swan DM; Pustejovsky JE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):574-593. PubMed ID: 29757002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures.
    Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):217-235. PubMed ID: 29911874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs.
    Natesan Batley P; Nandakumar R; Palka JM; Shrestha P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():617047. PubMed ID: 33519641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multilevel meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs using robust variance estimation.
    Chen M; Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Jun; 29(3):537-560. PubMed ID: 35786985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating slope and level change in N = 1 designs.
    Solanas A; Manolov R; Onghena P
    Behav Modif; 2010 May; 34(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 20234005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals.
    Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):324-41. PubMed ID: 26053946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conditional power of randomization tests for single-case effect sizes in designs with randomized treatment order: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Michiels B; Heyvaert M; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):557-575. PubMed ID: 28389851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian unknown change-point models to investigate immediacy in single case designs.
    Natesan P; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):743-759. PubMed ID: 28406673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
    Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating intervention effects across different types of single-subject experimental designs: empirical illustration.
    Moeyaert M; Ugille M; Ferron JM; Onghena P; Heyvaert M; Beretvas SN; Van den Noortgate W
    Sch Psychol Q; 2015 Mar; 30(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 24884449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of response-guided baseline phase extensions on treatment effect estimates.
    Joo SH; Ferron JM; Beretvas SN; Moeyaert M; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():77-87. PubMed ID: 29289405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probability of superiority for comparing two groups of clusters.
    Uanhoro JO
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):646-656. PubMed ID: 35411476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: a primer and applications.
    Shadish WR; Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):123-47. PubMed ID: 24606972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation-based power calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of health policy interventions.
    Zhang F; Wagner AK; Ross-Degnan D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1252-61. PubMed ID: 21640554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.