These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30285277)

  • 1. Predicting the time needed for environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps.
    Haddaway NR; Westgate MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 30285277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of evidence-review methods in restoration ecology.
    Romanelli JP; Meli P; Naves RP; Alves MC; Rodrigues RR
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):142-154. PubMed ID: 33347737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
    Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delphi survey on the most promising areas and methods to improve systematic reviews' production and updating.
    Mahmić-Kaknjo M; Tomić V; Ellen ME; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Sfetcu R; Baladia E; Riva N; Kassianos AP; Marušić A
    Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 12(1):56. PubMed ID: 36973729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
    Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.
    Clark J; Glasziou P; Del Mar C; Bannach-Brown A; Stehlik P; Scott AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():81-90. PubMed ID: 32004673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management.
    Haddaway NR; Bernes C; Jonsson BG; Hedlund K
    Ambio; 2016 Sep; 45(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 26984257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How we promote rigour in systematic reviews and evidence maps at Environment International.
    Whaley P; Roth N
    Environ Int; 2022 Dec; 170():107543. PubMed ID: 36280492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping.
    Chaabna K; Cheema S; Abraham A; Alrouh H; Mamtani R; Sheikh JI
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):94. PubMed ID: 30021616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease.
    Li J; Brisson C; Clays E; Ferrario MM; Ivanov ID; Landsbergis P; Leppink N; Pega F; Pikhart H; Prüss-Üstün A; Rugulies R; Schnall PL; Stevens G; Tsutsumi A; Ujita Y; Siegrist J
    Environ Int; 2018 Oct; 119():558-569. PubMed ID: 30125833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.
    Allers K; Hoffmann F; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 29258907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data extraction and comparison for complex systematic reviews: a step-by-step guideline and an implementation example using open-source software.
    Afifi M; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(1):226. PubMed ID: 38041161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
    Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption.
    Bojcic R; Todoric M; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):104. PubMed ID: 35399051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review.
    Nussbaumer-Streit B; Ellen M; Klerings I; Sfetcu R; Riva N; Mahmić-Kaknjo M; Poulentzas G; Martinez P; Baladia E; Ziganshina LE; Marqués ME; Aguilar L; Kassianos AP; Frampton G; Silva AG; Affengruber L; Spjker R; Thomas J; Berg RC; Kontogiani M; Sousa M; Kontogiorgis C; Gartlehner G;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():287-296. PubMed ID: 34091021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.