176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30285780)
1. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in male urogenital function preservation, a meta-analysis.
Tang X; Wang Z; Wu X; Yang M; Wang D
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):196. PubMed ID: 30285780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Broholm M; Pommergaard HC; Gögenür I
Colorectal Dis; 2015 May; 17(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 25515638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urinary and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Li X; Zhang H; Li H; Shen X
J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):262. PubMed ID: 38907844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.
Kim JY; Kim NK; Lee KY; Hur H; Min BS; Kim JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):2485-93. PubMed ID: 22434245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis.
Fleming CA; Cullinane C; Lynch N; Killeen S; Coffey JC; Peirce CB
Br J Surg; 2021 Mar; 108(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 33711141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery.
Kim HJ; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Yang CS; Lee HJ
Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 20(5):O103-O113. PubMed ID: 29460997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectal cancer on protection of male urinary and sexual functions.
Wei HB; Fang JF; Zheng ZH; Wei B; Huang JL; Chen TF; Huang Y; Lei PR
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(24):e3925. PubMed ID: 27311004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations.
Luca F; Craigg DK; Senthil M; Selleck MJ; Babcock BD; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA
Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 30120743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study.
Panteleimonitis S; Ahmed J; Ramachandra M; Farooq M; Harper M; Parvaiz A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 32(2):241-248. PubMed ID: 27770247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-Related Functional Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery Compared With a Laparoscopic Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Waters PS; McCormick JJ; Warrier SK; Heriot A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1191-1204. PubMed ID: 35853177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
Wang G; Wang Z; Jiang Z; Liu J; Zhao J; Li J
Int J Med Robot; 2017 Mar; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 26748601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Pooled Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Wang Y; Zhao GH; Yang H; Lin J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 27213786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Male urogenital function after robot-assisted and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Tang B; Gao G; Ye S; Liu D; Jiang Q; Ai J; Lei X; Shi J; Li T
BMC Surg; 2022 May; 22(1):185. PubMed ID: 35568823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of robotic rectal surgery on sexual and urinary functions in male patients.
Ozeki S; Maeda K; Hanai T; Masumori K; Katsuno H; Takahashi H
Surg Today; 2016 Apr; 46(4):491-500. PubMed ID: 26198896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Tang B; Lei X; Ai J; Huang Z; Shi J; Li T
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 19(1):38. PubMed ID: 33536032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urological and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Feb; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32945090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient quality of life and short-term surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic anterior resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
Kamali D; Omar K; Imam SZ; Jha A; Reddy A; Jha M
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 May; 21(5):355-361. PubMed ID: 28560480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The urinary and sexual outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang H; Zhou L
Surg Today; 2024 May; 54(5):397-406. PubMed ID: 36943447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
