These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30286187)
1. Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Choi CH; Park SY; Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Kim JI PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205229. PubMed ID: 30286187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy. Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy. Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer. Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer. Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning. Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors]. Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy. Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent. Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate. Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants. Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy. Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy. Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fast inverse treatment planning strategy facilitating optimized catheter selection in image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy. Guthier CV; Damato AL; Hesser JW; Viswanathan AN; Cormack RA Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6117-6127. PubMed ID: 28921538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different treatment planning optimization methods for vaginal HDR brachytherapy with multichannel applicators: A reduction of the high doses to the vaginal mucosa is possible. Carrara M; Cusumano D; Giandini T; Tenconi C; Mazzarella E; Grisotto S; Massari E; Mazzeo D; Cerrotta A; Pappalardi B; Fallai C; Pignoli E Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():58-65. PubMed ID: 29254592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers. Jamema SV; Sharma S; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21030317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate. Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]