These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30286519)

  • 1. Planning percutaneous coronary interventions using computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve-derived from computed tomography: A state-of-the-art review.
    Feldmann K; Cami E; Safian RD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30286519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography on Heart Team Treatment Decision-Making in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION Trial.
    Andreini D; Modolo R; Katagiri Y; Mushtaq S; Sonck J; Collet C; De Martini S; Roberto M; Tanaka K; Miyazaki Y; Czapla J; Schoors D; Plass A; Maisano F; Kaufmann P; Orry X; Metzdorf PA; Folliguet T; Färber G; Diamantis I; Schönweiß M; Bonalumi G; Guglielmo M; Ferrari C; Olivares P; Cavallotti L; Leal I; Lindeboom W; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Bartorelli AL;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e007607. PubMed ID: 31833413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
    Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography reclassification rate using value distal to lesion compared to lowest value.
    Kueh SH; Mooney J; Ohana M; Kim U; Blanke P; Grover R; Sellers S; Ellis J; Murphy D; Hague C; Bax JJ; Nørgaard BL; Rabbat M; Leipsic JA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 28986147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography.
    Sonck J; Nagumo S; Norgaard BL; Otake H; Ko B; Zhang J; Mizukami T; Maeng M; Andreini D; Takahashi Y; Jensen JM; Ihdayhid A; Heggermont W; Barbato E; Mileva N; Munhoz D; Bartunek J; Updegrove A; Collinsworth A; Penicka M; Van Hoe L; Leipsic J; Koo BK; De Bruyne B; Collet C
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jul; 15(7):1242-1255. PubMed ID: 35798401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
    Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries.
    Modi BN; Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Ellis H; Rogers C; Taylor CA; Rajani R; Perera D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007577. PubMed ID: 30722688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
    Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive procedural planning using computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; Driessen RS; van Diemen PA; Everaars H; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; Sprengers RW; Verouden NJW; Nap A; Opolski MP; Leipsic JA; Danad I; Taylor CA; Knaapen P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):614-622. PubMed ID: 32845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Computed Fractional Flow Reserve Coronary CT Angiography (FFRCT) Offer an Accurate Noninvasive Comparison to Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA)? "The Noninvasive CATH." A Comprehensive Review.
    Raja J; Seitz MP; Yedlapati N; Khouzam RN
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 46(3):100642. PubMed ID: 32624193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD.
    Nørgaard BL; Hjort J; Gaur S; Hansson N; Bøtker HE; Leipsic J; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Pedersen K; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Gormsen LC; Mæng M; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Jensen JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):541-550. PubMed ID: 27085447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
    Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial.
    Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the Routine Availability of CT-Derived FFR Influence Management of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Compared to CT Angiography Alone?: The FFR
    Curzen NP; Nolan J; Zaman AG; Nørgaard BL; Rajani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 27568119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rationale, design and goals of the HeartFlow assessing diagnostic value of non-invasive FFR
    Chinnaiyan KM; Akasaka T; Amano T; Bax JJ; Blanke P; De Bruyne B; Kawasaki T; Leipsic J; Matsuo H; Morino Y; Nieman K; Norgaard BL; Patel MR; Pontone G; Rabbat M; Rogers C; Sand NP; Raff G
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28017291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
    Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography in Nonculprit Lesions of Patients With Recent STEMI.
    Gaur S; Taylor CA; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Holm NR; Leipsic J; Zarins CK; Achenbach S; Khem S; Wilk A; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 27743953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
    Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.