141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30287224)
1. Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome.
Wu S; Lin SX; Wirth GJ; Lu M; Lu J; Subtelny AO; Wang Z; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Wu CL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e44-e52. PubMed ID: 30287224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Marcq G; Michelet A; Hannink G; Rizk J; Sauvain J; Villers A; Saffarini M; Rochat CH
BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term Oncologic Impact of Positive Anterior and Posterior Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy.
Wu S; Lin SX; Wirth GJ; Lu M; Lu J; Subtelny AO; Wang Z; Olumi AF; Dahl DM; Blute ML; Wu CL
Am J Clin Oncol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):872-879. PubMed ID: 33002923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Amling C; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2016 Feb; 117(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 26010160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of positive surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy and their association with clinical recurrence.
Bianchi L; Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Casablanca C; Chessa F; Mineo Bianchi F; Pultrone C; Vagnoni V; Ercolino A; Dababneh H; Fiorentino M; Brunocilla E
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Aug; 72(4):464-473. PubMed ID: 31144486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
