149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30287224)
21. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.
Rouanne M; Rode J; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 23883410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.
Ouzzane A; Rozet F; Salas RS; Galiano M; Barret E; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 23889763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Yuan J; Jiang Y; Yang W
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1803-1815. PubMed ID: 29766319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.
Somford DM; van Oort IM; Cosyns JP; Witjes JA; Kiemeney LA; Tombal B
World J Urol; 2012 Feb; 30(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 21240506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
Evans SM; Millar JL; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Davis ID; Spelman T; Bolton DM; Giles GG; Dean J; Costello AJ; Frauman AG; Kearns PA; Day L; Daniels C; McNeill JJ
BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114(5):680-90. PubMed ID: 24128010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer.
Kang YJ; Abalajon MJ; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Yoon CY; Lee JY; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158922. PubMed ID: 27391650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.
Barré C; Thoulouzan M; Aillet G; Nguyen JM
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):522-31. PubMed ID: 24112703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic impact of time to undetectable prostate-specific antigen in patients with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy.
Koo KC; Tuliao P; Komninos C; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Jee SH; Rha KH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):693-700. PubMed ID: 25190131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
