These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30287709)

  • 1. Evaluation of Influence of Widening Apical Preparation of Root Canals on Efficiency of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Agitation Protocols: Study by Scanning Electron Microscopy.
    Marques AC; Aguiar BA; Frota LM; Guimarães BM; Vivacqua-Gomes N; Vivan RR; Duarte MA; de Vasconcelos BC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1087-1094. PubMed ID: 30287709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
    Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite.
    Orlowski NB; Schimdt TF; Teixeira CDS; Garcia LDFR; Savaris JM; Tay FR; Bortoluzzi EA
    J Endod; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1738-1744. PubMed ID: 32721483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cleaning the apical third of curved canals after different irrigation protocols.
    Pereira ES; Peixoto IF; Nakagawa RK; Buono VT; Bahia MG
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 23207848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.
    Buldur B; Kapdan A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29072242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals.
    Yeung W; Raldi DP; Cunha RS; Mello I
    Aust Endod J; 2014 Aug; 40(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 25244220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the Efficacy of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Versus Irrigation with Reciprocating Activation: An Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.
    Kato AS; Cunha RS; da Silveira Bueno CE; Pelegrine RA; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):659-63. PubMed ID: 26906240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of apical enlargement in cleaning of curved canals using negative pressure system.
    Lorencetti KT; Silva-Sousa YT; Nascimento GE; Messias DC; Colucci V; Abi Rached-Junior F; Silva SR
    Braz Dent J; 2014; 25(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 25517780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different final irrigant activation techniques on the bond strength of an epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer: a preliminary study.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Tuncay Ö; Demirbuga S; Dinçer AN; Arslan H
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):862-6. PubMed ID: 24862718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of agitation of EDTA with 808-nanometer diode laser on removal of smear layer.
    Arslan H; Ayrancı LB; Karatas E; Topçuoğlu HS; Yavuz MS; Kesim B
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1589-92. PubMed ID: 24238453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Plotino G; Özyürek T; Grande NM; Gündoğar M
    Int Endod J; 2019 Mar; 52(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 30129186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.