331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30287908)
1. Metabarcoding of marine environmental DNA based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes.
Günther B; Knebelsberger T; Neumann H; Laakmann S; Martínez Arbizu P
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14822. PubMed ID: 30287908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water.
Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys.
Grey EK; Bernatchez L; Cassey P; Deiner K; Deveney M; Howland KL; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Leong SCY; Li Y; Olds B; Pfrender ME; Prowse TAA; Renshaw MA; Lodge DM
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8843. PubMed ID: 29891968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance comparison of genetic markers for high-throughput sequencing-based biodiversity assessment in complex communities.
Zhan A; Bailey SA; Heath DD; Macisaac HJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Sep; 14(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 24655333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys.
Geller J; Meyer C; Parker M; Hawk H
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):851-61. PubMed ID: 23848937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcoding identifies Eimeria species and contributes to the phylogenetics of coccidian parasites (Eimeriorina, Apicomplexa, Alveolata).
Ogedengbe JD; Hanner RH; Barta JR
Int J Parasitol; 2011 Jul; 41(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 21515277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes.
Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa.
Andújar C; Arribas P; Yu DW; Vogler AP; Emerson BC
Mol Ecol; 2018 Oct; 27(20):3968-3975. PubMed ID: 30129071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep-Sea, Deep-Sequencing: Metabarcoding Extracellular DNA from Sediments of Marine Canyons.
Guardiola M; Uriz MJ; Taberlet P; Coissac E; Wangensteen OS; Turon X
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139633. PubMed ID: 26436773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods.
Marquina D; Andersson AF; Ronquist F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 30226026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding of Foraminifera communities using taxon-specific primers.
Macher JN; Bloska DM; Holzmann M; Girard EB; Pawlowski J; Renema W
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13952. PubMed ID: 36093332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining morpho-taxonomy and metabarcoding enhances the detection of non-indigenous marine pests in biofouling communities.
Ammon UV; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Tait L; Lavery S; Inglis GJ; Pochon X
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16290. PubMed ID: 30389965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of molecular species identification for North Sea calanoid copepods (Crustacea) using proteome fingerprints and DNA sequences.
Laakmann S; Gerdts G; Erler R; Knebelsberger T; Martínez Arbizu P; Raupach MJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):862-76. PubMed ID: 23848968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-marker metabarcoding approach to study mesozooplankton at basin scale.
Stefanni S; Stanković D; Borme D; de Olazabal A; Juretić T; Pallavicini A; Tirelli V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12085. PubMed ID: 30108256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias.
Clarke LJ; Soubrier J; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1160-70. PubMed ID: 24751203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines.
Brandon-Mong GJ; Gan HM; Sing KW; Lee PS; Lim PE; Wilson JJ
Bull Entomol Res; 2015 Dec; 105(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 26344799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
