These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30287908)
1. Metabarcoding of marine environmental DNA based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Günther B; Knebelsberger T; Neumann H; Laakmann S; Martínez Arbizu P Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14822. PubMed ID: 30287908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement. Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water. Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers. Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys. Grey EK; Bernatchez L; Cassey P; Deiner K; Deveney M; Howland KL; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Leong SCY; Li Y; Olds B; Pfrender ME; Prowse TAA; Renshaw MA; Lodge DM Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8843. PubMed ID: 29891968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection. Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Geller J; Meyer C; Parker M; Hawk H Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):851-61. PubMed ID: 23848937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcoding identifies Eimeria species and contributes to the phylogenetics of coccidian parasites (Eimeriorina, Apicomplexa, Alveolata). Ogedengbe JD; Hanner RH; Barta JR Int J Parasitol; 2011 Jul; 41(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 21515277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes. Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa. Andújar C; Arribas P; Yu DW; Vogler AP; Emerson BC Mol Ecol; 2018 Oct; 27(20):3968-3975. PubMed ID: 30129071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep-Sea, Deep-Sequencing: Metabarcoding Extracellular DNA from Sediments of Marine Canyons. Guardiola M; Uriz MJ; Taberlet P; Coissac E; Wangensteen OS; Turon X PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139633. PubMed ID: 26436773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods. Marquina D; Andersson AF; Ronquist F Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 30226026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol. Elbrecht V; Leese F PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding of Foraminifera communities using taxon-specific primers. Macher JN; Bloska DM; Holzmann M; Girard EB; Pawlowski J; Renema W PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13952. PubMed ID: 36093332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining morpho-taxonomy and metabarcoding enhances the detection of non-indigenous marine pests in biofouling communities. Ammon UV; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Tait L; Lavery S; Inglis GJ; Pochon X Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16290. PubMed ID: 30389965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of molecular species identification for North Sea calanoid copepods (Crustacea) using proteome fingerprints and DNA sequences. Laakmann S; Gerdts G; Erler R; Knebelsberger T; Martínez Arbizu P; Raupach MJ Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):862-76. PubMed ID: 23848968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-efficient PCR based DNA barcoding of marine invertebrate specimens with NovaSeq amplicon sequencing. Kobayashi G; Abe H Mol Biol Rep; 2024 Aug; 51(1):887. PubMed ID: 39105821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-marker metabarcoding approach to study mesozooplankton at basin scale. Stefanni S; Stanković D; Borme D; de Olazabal A; Juretić T; Pallavicini A; Tirelli V Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12085. PubMed ID: 30108256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Taxonomic and abundance biases affect the record of marine eukaryotic plankton communities in sediment DNA archives. Nguyen NL; Pawłowska J; Zajaczkowski M; Weiner AKM; Cordier T; Grant DM; De Schepper S; Pawłowski J Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Nov; 24(8):e14014. PubMed ID: 39188124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]