These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30287923)

  • 1. Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of sequencing data with paired tumor and normal samples.
    Barnell EK; Ronning P; Campbell KM; Krysiak K; Ainscough BJ; Sheta LM; Pema SP; Schmidt AD; Richters M; Cotto KC; Danos AM; Ramirez C; Skidmore ZL; Spies NC; Hundal J; Sediqzad MS; Kunisaki J; Gomez F; Trani L; Matlock M; Wagner AH; Swamidass SJ; Griffith M; Griffith OL
    Genet Med; 2019 Apr; 21(4):972-981. PubMed ID: 30287923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A deep learning approach to automate refinement of somatic variant calling from cancer sequencing data.
    Ainscough BJ; Barnell EK; Ronning P; Campbell KM; Wagner AH; Fehniger TA; Dunn GP; Uppaluri R; Govindan R; Rohan TE; Griffith M; Mardis ER; Swamidass SJ; Griffith OL
    Nat Genet; 2018 Dec; 50(12):1735-1743. PubMed ID: 30397337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FIREVAT: finding reliable variants without artifacts in human cancer samples using etiologically relevant mutational signatures.
    Kim H; Lee AJ; Lee J; Chun H; Ju YS; Hong D
    Genome Med; 2019 Dec; 11(1):81. PubMed ID: 31847917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
    Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
    Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
    Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VCF-Miner: GUI-based application for mining variants and annotations stored in VCF files.
    Hart SN; Duffy P; Quest DJ; Hossain A; Meiners MA; Kocher JP
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 26210358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open-Sourced CIViC Annotation Pipeline to Identify and Annotate Clinically Relevant Variants Using Single-Molecule Molecular Inversion Probes.
    Barnell EK; Waalkes A; Mosior MC; Penewit K; Cotto KC; Danos AM; Sheta LM; Campbell KM; Krysiak K; Rieke D; Spies NC; Skidmore ZL; Pritchard CC; Fehniger TA; Uppaluri R; Govindan R; Griffith M; Salipante SJ; Griffith OL
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 Oct; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31618044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
    Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SomatoSim: precision simulation of somatic single nucleotide variants.
    Hawari MA; Hong CS; Biesecker LG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):109. PubMed ID: 33676403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing.
    Ura H; Togi S; Niida Y
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 32429412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variant Review with the Integrative Genomics Viewer.
    Robinson JT; Thorvaldsdóttir H; Wenger AM; Zehir A; Mesirov JP
    Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e31-e34. PubMed ID: 29092934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
    van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple combination of multiple somatic variant callers to increase accuracy.
    Trevarton AJ; Chang JT; Symmans WF
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8463. PubMed ID: 37231022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. tarSVM: Improving the accuracy of variant calls derived from microfluidic PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing using a support vector machine.
    Gillies CE; Otto EA; Vega-Warner V; Robertson CC; Sanna-Cherchi S; Gharavi A; Crawford B; Bhimma R; Winkler C; ; ; Kang HM; Sampson MG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):233. PubMed ID: 27287006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Leveraging Spatial Variation in Tumor Purity for Improved Somatic Variant Calling of Archival Tumor Only Samples.
    Halperin RF; Liang WS; Kulkarni S; Tassone EE; Adkins J; Enriquez D; Tran NL; Hank NC; Newell J; Kodira C; Korn R; Berens ME; Kim S; Byron SA
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():119. PubMed ID: 30949446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Software-Assisted Manual Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Data: An Alternative to Routine Sanger Sequencing Confirmation with Equivalent Results in >15,000 Germline DNA Screens.
    Muzzey D; Kash S; Johnson JI; Melroy LM; Kaleta P; Pierce KA; Ready K; Kang HP; Haas KR
    J Mol Diagn; 2019 Mar; 21(2):296-306. PubMed ID: 30529126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing variant calling algorithms for target-exon sequencing in a large sample.
    Lo Y; Kang HM; Nelson MR; Othman MI; Chissoe SL; Ehm MG; Abecasis GR; Zöllner S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():75. PubMed ID: 25884587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variant Calling From Next Generation Sequence Data.
    Hansen NF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():209-24. PubMed ID: 27008017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.