BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30289476)

  • 21. Nonsurgical correction of skeletal deep overbite and class II division 2 malocclusion in an adult patient.
    Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 15356503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Skeletal and dental changes associated with the treatment of deep bite malocclusion.
    Parker CD; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Apr; 107(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 7709903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of malocclusion on the depth of curve of Spee.
    Ahmed I; Nazir R; Gul-e-Erum ; Ahsan T
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Nov; 61(11):1056-9. PubMed ID: 22125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postretention relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in patients treated without mandibular premolar extraction.
    Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A; Janson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 15067265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
    de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is there variation in the depth of the curve of Spee in individuals with different dentoskeletal patterns? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Paes-Souza SA; Marañón-Vásquez GA; Galisteu-Luiz K; Ferreira DMTP; Maia LC; Nojima MDCG
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Sep; 44(5):491-502. PubMed ID: 35108382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative study between the effect of reverse curve of Spee archwires and anterior bite turbos in the treatment of deep overbite cases.
    Al-Zoubi EM; Al-Nimri KS
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 34329389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A cephalometric study of the skeletal and dento-alveolar effects of the modified Louisiana State University activator in Class II malocclusion.
    Kang Y; Franchi L; Manton DJ; Schneider PM
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Apr; 40(2):164-175. PubMed ID: 29016763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of conformity of preformed orthodontic archwires and dental arch form.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 30916248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relapse revisited--again.
    Dyer KC; Vaden JL; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 22858332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
    Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Separation of aligning and leveling stages to control mandibular incisor inclination: A randomized clinical trial.
    Theerasopon P; Lindauer SJ; Charoemratrote C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(2):e2119378. PubMed ID: 33950082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.
    Ko EW; Hsu SS; Hsieh HY; Wang YC; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1469-77. PubMed ID: 21256648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in mandibular incisor position in Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with premolar extractions.
    Al-Nimri KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 14666086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.