126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30290057)
1. Osteophytes in the Cervical Vertebral Bodies (C3-C7)-Demographical Perspectives.
Ezra D; Hershkovitz I; Salame K; Alperovitch-Najenson D; Slon V
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2019 Feb; 302(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 30290057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osteophytes on the zygapophyseal (facet) joints of the cervical spine (C3-C7): A skeletal study.
Ezra D; Kedar E; Salame K; Alperovitch-Najenson D; Hershkovitz I
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2022 May; 305(5):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 34463041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Demographic aspects in cervical vertebral bodies' size and shape (C3-C7): a skeletal study.
Ezra D; Masharawi Y; Salame K; Slon V; Alperovitch-Najenson D; Hershkovitz I
Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 27544049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital tracking algorithm reveals the influence of structural irregularities on joint movements in the human cervical spine.
Balkovec C; Veldhuis J; Baird JW; Wayne Brodland G; McGill SM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jul; 56():11-17. PubMed ID: 29738991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiological studies on the best entry point and trajectory of anterior cervical pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine].
Zhao LJ; Xu RM; Hua Q; Ma WH; Jiang WY; Zhu YZ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2012 Dec; 25(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 23627153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence and motion characteristics of degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis in the symptomatic adult.
Suzuki A; Daubs MD; Inoue H; Hayashi T; Aghdasi B; Montgomery SR; Ruangchainikom M; Hu X; Lee CJ; Wang CJ; Wang BJ; Nakamura H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1115-20. PubMed ID: 23680839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extrinsic risk factors for compromised blood flow in the vertebral artery: anatomical observations of the transverse foramina from C3 to C7.
Cagnie B; Barbaix E; Vinck E; D'Herde K; Cambier D
Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Nov; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 16132191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical function of vertebral body osteophytes, as revealed by experiments on cadaveric spines.
Al-Rawahi M; Luo J; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(10):770-7. PubMed ID: 20683388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical uncinate process: an anatomic study for anterior decompression of the cervical spine.
Lu J; Ebraheim NA; Yang H; Skie M; Yeasting RA
Surg Radiol Anat; 1998; 20(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 9787390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
