These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30290783)

  • 1. Barriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: a comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attenders.
    von Wagner C; Bonello B; Stoffel S; Skrobanski H; Freeman M; Kerrison RS; McGregor LM
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Oct; 18(1):1161. PubMed ID: 30290783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial.
    McGregor LM; Skrobanski H; Ritchie M; Berkman L; Miller H; Freeman M; Patel N; Morris S; Rees C; von Wagner C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e023801. PubMed ID: 30772850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a 12 months' self-referral reminder to facilitate uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening in previous non-responders: a London-based feasibility study.
    Kerrison RS; McGregor LM; Marshall S; Isitt J; Counsell N; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Br J Cancer; 2016 Mar; 114(7):751-8. PubMed ID: 26977856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme.
    Kerrison RS; McGregor LM; Marshall S; Isitt J; Counsell N; Rees CJ; von Wagner C
    Endoscopy; 2017 Jan; 49(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27997965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Specialist Screening Practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of the Bowel Scope (Flexible Sigmoidoscopy) Screening Programme: a study protocol for a feasibility single-stage phase II trial.
    McGregor LM; Skrobanski H; Miller H; Ritchie M; Berkman L; Morris S; Rees C; von Wagner C
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2016; 2():54. PubMed ID: 27965871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
    Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a GP-endorsed 12 months' reminder letter to promote uptake of bowel scope screening: protocol for a randomised controlled trial in a hard-to-reach population.
    von Wagner C; Hirst Y; Tookey S; Kerrison RS; Marshall S; Prentice A; Vulkan D; Macleod U; Duffy S
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e022263. PubMed ID: 29730633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial.
    Sutton S; Wardle J; Taylor T; McCaffery K; Williamson S; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Hart A; Northover J; Atkin W
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11002451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using primary care-based paper and telephone interventions to increase uptake of bowel scope screening in Yorkshire: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
    McGregor LM; Kerrison RS; Green T; Macleod U; Hughes M; Gibbins M; Morris S; Rees C; von Wagner C
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e024616. PubMed ID: 30056395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
    Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Rivero-Arias O; Tsiachristas A; Cruickshank M; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Sep; 20(68):1-138. PubMed ID: 27632816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey.
    Kobayashi LC; Waller J; von Wagner C; Wardle J
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Jul; 16():659. PubMed ID: 27473593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a GP-endorsed non-participant reminder letter to promote uptake of bowel scope screening: A randomised controlled trial in a hard-to-reach population.
    Kaushal A; Hirst Y; Tookey S; Kerrison RS; Marshall S; Prentice A; Vulkan D; Duffy S; von Wagner C
    Prev Med; 2020 Dec; 141():106268. PubMed ID: 33022321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uptake of Bowel Scope (Flexible Sigmoidoscopy) Screening in the English National Programme: the first 14 months.
    McGregor LM; Bonello B; Kerrison RS; Nickerson C; Baio G; Berkman L; Rees CJ; Atkin W; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    J Med Screen; 2016 Jun; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 26387824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A population survey on beliefs around cervical cancer screening: determining the barriers and facilitators associated with attendance.
    Judah G; Dilib F; Darzi A; Huf S
    BMC Cancer; 2022 May; 22(1):522. PubMed ID: 35534802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy colorectal cancer screening in low uptake socio-demographic groups: A systematic review.
    Travis E; Ashley L; Pownall M; O'Connor DB
    Psychooncology; 2020 Aug; 29(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 32539187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial.
    Allgood PC; Maroni R; Hudson S; Offman J; Turnbull AE; Peacock L; Steel J; Kirby G; Ingram CE; Somers J; Fuller C; Threlfall AG; Gabe R; Maxwell AJ; Patnick J; Duffy SW
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Jul; 18(7):972-980. PubMed ID: 28522311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Two Self-referral Reminders and a Theory-Based Leaflet to Increase the Uptake of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the English Bowel Scope Screening Program: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in London.
    Kerrison RS; McGregor LM; Counsell N; Marshall S; Prentice A; Isitt J; Rees CJ; von Wagner C
    Ann Behav Med; 2018 Oct; 52(11):941-951. PubMed ID: 30346495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptance of screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Cockburn J; Thomas RJ; McLaughlin SJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 7497160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening program: results of the English early pilot.
    Bevan R; Rubin G; Sofianopoulou E; Patnick J; Rees CJ
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 25268309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
    Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.