288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30290830)
1. Reconstruction of avian ancestral karyotypes reveals differences in the evolutionary history of macro- and microchromosomes.
Damas J; Kim J; Farré M; Griffin DK; Larkin DM
Genome Biol; 2018 Oct; 19(1):155. PubMed ID: 30290830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrative comparative analysis of avian chromosome evolution by in-silico mapping of the gene ontology of homologous synteny blocks and evolutionary breakpoint regions.
Claeys J; Romanov MN; Griffin DK
Genetica; 2023 Jun; 151(3):167-178. PubMed ID: 36940055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor.
Romanov MN; Farré M; Lithgow PE; Fowler KE; Skinner BM; O'Connor R; Fonseka G; Backström N; Matsuda Y; Nishida C; Houde P; Jarvis ED; Ellegren H; Burt DW; Larkin DM; Griffin DK
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1060. PubMed ID: 25496766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chromosome-level assembly reveals extensive rearrangement in saker falcon and budgerigar, but not ostrich, genomes.
O'Connor RE; Farré M; Joseph S; Damas J; Kiazim L; Jennings R; Bennett S; Slack EA; Allanson E; Larkin DM; Griffin DK
Genome Biol; 2018 Oct; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 30355328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstruction of the diapsid ancestral genome permits chromosome evolution tracing in avian and non-avian dinosaurs.
O'Connor RE; Romanov MN; Kiazim LG; Barrett PM; Farré M; Damas J; Ferguson-Smith M; Valenzuela N; Larkin DM; Griffin DK
Nat Commun; 2018 May; 9(1):1883. PubMed ID: 29784931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-species chromosome painting corroborates microchromosome fusion during karyotype evolution of birds.
Hansmann T; Nanda I; Volobouev V; Yang F; Schartl M; Haaf T; Schmid M
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2009; 126(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 20068299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time lapse: A glimpse into prehistoric genomics.
Griffin DK; Larkin DM; O'Connor RE
Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Feb; 63(2):103640. PubMed ID: 30922926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes.
Burt DW
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2002; 96(1-4):97-112. PubMed ID: 12438785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel Insights into Chromosome Evolution in Birds, Archosaurs, and Reptiles.
Farré M; Narayan J; Slavov GT; Damas J; Auvil L; Li C; Jarvis ED; Burt DW; Griffin DK; Larkin DM
Genome Biol Evol; 2016 Aug; 8(8):2442-51. PubMed ID: 27401172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interspecies Chromosome Mapping in Caprimulgiformes, Piciformes, Suliformes, and Trogoniformes (Aves): Cytogenomic Insight into Microchromosome Organization and Karyotype Evolution in Birds.
Kretschmer R; de Souza MS; Furo IO; Romanov MN; Gunski RJ; Garnero ADV; de Freitas TRO; de Oliveira EHC; O'Connor RE; Griffin DK
Cells; 2021 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33916942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstruction and evolutionary history of eutherian chromosomes.
Kim J; Farré M; Auvil L; Capitanu B; Larkin DM; Ma J; Lewin HA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jul; 114(27):E5379-E5388. PubMed ID: 28630326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of the ancestral mammalian karyotype and syntenic regions.
Damas J; Corbo M; Kim J; Turner-Maier J; Farré M; Larkin DM; Ryder OA; Steiner C; Houck ML; Hall S; Shiue L; Thomas S; Swale T; Daly M; Korlach J; Uliano-Silva M; Mazzoni CJ; Birren BW; Genereux DP; Johnson J; Lindblad-Toh K; Karlsson EK; Nweeia MT; Johnson RN; ; Lewin HA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(40):e2209139119. PubMed ID: 36161960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Mapping of the Macrochromosomes of Eight Avian Species Provides Further Insight into Their Phylogenetic Relationships and Avian Karyotype Evolution.
Kiazim LG; O'Connor RE; Larkin DM; Romanov MN; Narushin VG; Brazhnik EA; Griffin DK
Cells; 2021 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33572408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conservation of chromosomes syntenic with avian autosomes in squamate reptiles revealed by comparative chromosome painting.
Pokorná M; Giovannotti M; Kratochvíl L; Caputo V; Olmo E; Ferguson-Smith MA; Rens W
Chromosoma; 2012 Aug; 121(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 22619043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.
Kemkemer C; Kohn M; Cooper DN; Froenicke L; Högel J; Hameister H; Kehrer-Sawatzki H
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 9():84. PubMed ID: 19393055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Hypermethylated Regions in Avian Chromosomes.
Schmid M; Steinlein C
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2017; 151(4):216-227. PubMed ID: 28315870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chromosome Painting in Trogon s. surrucura (Aves, Trogoniformes) Reveals a Karyotype Derived by Chromosomal Fissions, Fusions, and Inversions.
Degrandi TM; Del Valle Garnero A; O'Brien PCM; Ferguson-Smith MA; Kretschmer R; de Oliveira EHC; Gunski RJ
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2017; 151(4):208-215. PubMed ID: 28501862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Chromosome Painting in Two Brazilian Stork Species with Different Diploid Numbers.
Seligmann ICA; Furo IO; Dos Santos MS; Tagliarini MM; Araujo CCD; O''Brien PCM; Ferguson-Smith MA; de Oliveira EHC
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2019; 159(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 31542782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of gene regulation in ruminants differs between evolutionary breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks.
Farré M; Kim J; Proskuryakova AA; Zhang Y; Kulemzina AI; Li Q; Zhou Y; Xiong Y; Johnson JL; Perelman PL; Johnson WE; Warren WC; Kukekova AV; Zhang G; O'Brien SJ; Ryder OA; Graphodatsky AS; Ma J; Lewin HA; Larkin DM
Genome Res; 2019 Apr; 29(4):576-589. PubMed ID: 30760546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synteny conservation of chicken macrochromosomes 1-10 in different avian lineages revealed by cross-species chromosome painting.
Nanda I; Benisch P; Fetting D; Haaf T; Schmid M
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 132(3):165-81. PubMed ID: 21099208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
