These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30291593)

  • 1. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compounding matters: Event-related potential evidence for early semantic access to compound words.
    Davis CP; Libben G; Segalowitz SJ
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():44-52. PubMed ID: 30557749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words.
    Frisson S; Niswander-Klement E; Pollatsek A
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 99(Pt 1):87-107. PubMed ID: 17535465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words.
    Xu J; Taft M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):904-10. PubMed ID: 25151246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
    Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Heard A; Lloyd E; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26944579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition.
    Smolka E; Eulitz C
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words.
    Tse CS; Chan YL; Yap MJ; Tsang HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4382-4402. PubMed ID: 36443581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of spoken compound words.
    Creemers A; Embick D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 May; 48(5):734-751. PubMed ID: 35389704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy.
    Goh WD; Yap MJ; Lau MC; Ng MM; Tan LC
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():976. PubMed ID: 27445936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CompLex: an eye-movement database of compound word reading in English.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 32572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2452-2461. PubMed ID: 30947626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enter sandman: Compound processing and semantic transparency in a compositional perspective.
    Günther F; Marelli M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1872-1882. PubMed ID: 30570322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
    Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.