These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30291593)

  • 21. Semantic transparency effects in German compounds: A large dataset and multiple-task investigation.
    Günther F; Marelli M; Bölte J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1208-1224. PubMed ID: 32052353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An ERP megastudy of Chinese word recognition.
    Tsang YK; Zou Y
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14111. PubMed ID: 35609148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feature distinctiveness effects in language acquisition and lexical processing: Insights from megastudies.
    Siew CSQ
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):669-685. PubMed ID: 31974763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words.
    Tse CS; Chan YL; Yap MJ; Tsang HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4382-4402. PubMed ID: 36443581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness.
    Libben G; Gibson M; Yoon YB; Sandra D
    Brain Lang; 2003 Jan; 84(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 12537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ; Chan YL; Sze WP; Shaoul C; Lin D
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1503-1519. PubMed ID: 27734329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The modulation of semantic transparency on the recognition memory for two-character Chinese words.
    Han YJ; Huang SC; Lee CY; Kuo WJ; Cheng SK
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1315-24. PubMed ID: 24894986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.
    Lehtonen M; Varjokallio M; Kivikari H; Hultén A; Virpioja S; Hakala T; Kurimo M; Lagus K; Salmelin R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1245-1269. PubMed ID: 31102191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are there task-specific effects in morphological processing? Examining semantic transparency effects in semantic categorisation and lexical decision.
    Chee QW; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Nov; 75(11):2073-2086. PubMed ID: 35083947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The time course of morphological processing during spoken word recognition in Chinese.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Ni A; Zhou J; Li X
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1957-1963. PubMed ID: 28361435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: Evidence from decision latencies and event-related potentials.
    Jared D; Jouravlev O; Joanisse MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):422-450. PubMed ID: 27685020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does CaSe-MiXinG disrupt the access to lexico-semantic information?
    Perea M; Fernández-López M; Marcet A
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):981-989. PubMed ID: 30370458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 24099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process.
    Deacon D; Hewitt S; Yang C; Nagata M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2000 Mar; 9(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 10729697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Passion" versus "patience": the effects of valence and arousal on constructive word recognition.
    Kever A; Grynberg D; Szmalec A; Smalle E; Vermeulen N
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1302-1309. PubMed ID: 30646832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.
    Lau MC; Goh WD; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 30226433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.