147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292255)
21. The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography.
Pfau PR; Perlman SB; Stanko P; Frick TJ; Gopal DV; Said A; Zhang Z; Weigel T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 17321235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PET-CT offers accurate assessment of tumour length in oesophageal malignancy.
Rollins KE; Lucas E; Tewari N; James E; Hughes S; Catton JA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 84(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 25435270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin post neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Patrão AS; Papaxoinis G; Kordatou Z; Weaver JM; Owen-Holt V; Alkhaffaf B; Galloway S; Mansoor W
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 30786962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of thoracic oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: a prospective study.
Katsoulis IE; Wong WL; Mattheou AK; Damani N; Chambers J; Livingstone JI
Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 17631431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Loco-regional staging accuracy in oesophageal cancer-How good are we in the modern era?
Bunting D; Bracey T; Fox B; Berrisford R; Wheatley T; Sanders G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():71-75. PubMed ID: 29153370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PET/CT predicts survival in patients undergoing primary surgery for esophageal cancer.
Lindner K; Palmes D; Senninger N; Hummel R
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2015 Feb; 400(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25572665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circumferential margin positivity and its impact on prognosis in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.
Sujendran V; Wheeler J; Baron R; Warren BF; Maynard N
Br J Surg; 2008 Feb; 95(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 17948302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Verhage RJ; Zandvoort HJ; ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 21566512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prognostic significance of novel ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT defined tumour variables in patients with oesophageal cancer.
Foley KG; Fielding P; Lewis WG; Karran A; Chan D; Blake P; Roberts SA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1069-1073. PubMed ID: 24794862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Discordant nodal staging identifies intermediate-risk group for overall survival in patients with cT3 oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Carder C; Fielding P; Roberts A; Foley K
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3429-3437. PubMed ID: 32055952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.
Saha AK; Sutton C; Rotimi O; Dexter S; Sue-Ling H; Sarela AI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 19252949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography as a predictor of long-term survival in oesophageal carcinoma.
Mariette C; Balon JM; Maunoury V; Taillier G; Van Seuningen I; Triboulet JP
Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1367-72. PubMed ID: 14598416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Foley KG; Lavery A; Napier E; Campbell D; Eatock MM; Kennedy RD; Bradley KM; Turkington RC
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13061. PubMed ID: 34158588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of circumferential resection margin clearance criteria with survival after surgery for cancer of esophagus.
Rao VS; Yeung MM; Cooke J; Salim E; Jain PK
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):745-9. PubMed ID: 22161989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of CT and MRI in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma and prediction of circumferential resection margin involvement by MRI.
Mathur P; Smith JJ; Ramsey C; Owen M; Thorpe A; Karim S; Burke C; Ramesh S; Dawson PM
Colorectal Dis; 2003 Sep; 5(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 12925069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Cerfolio RJ; Bryant AS; Ohja B; Bartolucci AA; Eloubeidi MA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1232-41. PubMed ID: 15942562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in oesophageal malignancy.
Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 32(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16504455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Significance of baseline FDG-PET/CT scan as a method of staging regional lymph nodes in patients with operable distal oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Papaxoinis G; Weaver JMJ; Khoja L; Patrao A; Stamatopoulou S; Alchawaf A; Owen-Holt V; Germetaki T; Kordatou Z; Mansoor W
Acta Oncol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):1224-1232. PubMed ID: 28524708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of preoperative staging for a priori resectable esophageal cancer.
Winiker M; Mantziari S; Figueiredo SG; Demartines N; Allemann P; Schäfer M
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 29346598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake value measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Cacicedo J; Fernandez I; Del Hoyo O; Navarro A; Gomez-Iturriaga A; Pijoan JI; Martinez-Indart L; Escudero J; Gomez-Suarez J; de Zarate RO; Perez JF; Bilbao P; Rades D
Clin Transl Oncol; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1337-1349. PubMed ID: 28540535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
