These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292499)

  • 1. Breast compression techniques in screening mammography - A Maltese evaluation project.
    Cassar Agius E; Naylor S
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 30292499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Waade GG; Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160770. PubMed ID: 28102696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression.
    Iotti V; Giorgi Rossi P; Canovi L; Guberti M; Nitrosi A; Lippolis DG; Marchesi V; Besutti G; Ottone M; Vacondio R; Pattacini P;
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):450-460. PubMed ID: 35869315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
    Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pain Experience and Image Quality with Curved versus Standard Compression for Breast Cancer Screening Mammography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    van der Waal D; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Tetteroo E; van Engen RE; Sechopoulos I; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJM
    Radiology; 2024 Aug; 312(2):e232680. PubMed ID: 39162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.
    Gennaro G; Povolo L; Del Genio S; Ciampani L; Fasoli C; Carlevaris P; Petrioli M; Masiero T; Maggetto F; Caumo F
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4738-4749. PubMed ID: 38019313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta.
    Borg M; Badr I; Royle GJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):168-83. PubMed ID: 23525916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Image Quality and Sensitivity in an Organized Mammography Screening Program.
    Théberge I; Guertin MH; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Dufresne MP; Wadden N; Shumak R; Samson C; Langlois A; Larocque I; Perron L; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Feb; 69(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 29458953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast compression across consecutive examinations among females participating in BreastScreen Norway.
    Waade GG; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20180209. PubMed ID: 29927636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.
    Whelehan P; Evans A; Ozakinci G
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 May; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 27739138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting.
    Spuur K; Webb J; Poulos A; Nielsen S; Robinson W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Mar; 100():76-84. PubMed ID: 29496083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.
    van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; den Heeten GJ; Timmers J; Broeders MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3322-7. PubMed ID: 25987428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience of pain during mammographic screening by three different compression paddles.
    Moshina N; Sagstad S; Holen ÅS; Backmann HA; Westermann LC; Hofvind S
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Aug; 29(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 37453253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Evensen KT; Hantho C; Iden KA; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():59-65. PubMed ID: 31084760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
    Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography system.
    den Boer D; Dam-Vervloet LAJ; Boomsma MF; de Boer E; van Dalen JA; Poot L
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():251-254. PubMed ID: 30017290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.
    Taif S; Tufail F; Alnuaimi AS
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e250-8. PubMed ID: 24673798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies enhancing the patient experience in mammography: A scoping review.
    Ding S; Fontaine T; Serex M; Sá Dos Reis C
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):340-352. PubMed ID: 38141428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.