These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292499)

  • 41. Improved Performance of Adjunctive Ultrasonography After Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Females.
    Dong H; Huang Y; Song F; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Wang P; Han J; Hao X; Chen K
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e353-e361. PubMed ID: 28887010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Breast Microcalcification Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Digital Mammograms.
    Cai H; Huang Q; Rong W; Song Y; Li J; Wang J; Chen J; Li L
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():2717454. PubMed ID: 30944574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Distribution of pressure on the breast in mammography using flexible and rigid compression plates: implications on patient handling.
    Dustler M; Förnvik D; Timberg P; Zackrisson S; Muller S
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Dec; 62(12):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 33280392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies.
    Funaro K; Drukteinis J; Falcon S
    South Med J; 2017 Oct; 110(10):607-613. PubMed ID: 28973699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions.
    de Groot JE; Hopman IGM; van Lier MGJTB; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():289-295. PubMed ID: 28027762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Arenas N; Alcantara R; Posso M; Louro J; Perez-Leon D; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Maiques J; Castells X; Macià F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7480-7487. PubMed ID: 35536390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Co-design of an intervention to optimize mammographic screening participation in women with obesity and/or physical disabilities.
    McBride KA; O'Fee A; Hogan S; Stewart E; Madeley C; Wilkes J; Wylie E; White A; Hickey M; Stone J
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 May; 30(3):951-963. PubMed ID: 38657389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause - A National Maltese Study.
    Mercieca N; Portelli JL; Jadva-Patel H
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28290336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Breast Cancer Screening and Optimizing Recommendations.
    Lancaster RB; Gulla S; De Los Santos J; Umphrey H
    Semin Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 53(4):280-293. PubMed ID: 30449346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
    Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
    Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Hodgson R; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Harvey SC; Edwards M; Shaikh J; Arber M; Glanville J
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():52-61. PubMed ID: 27212700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical image quality in daily practice of breast cancer mammography screening.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Dufresne MP; Zomahoun HT; Major D; Tremblay R; Ricard C; Shumak R; Wadden N; Pelletier E; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Aug; 65(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 24947189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of Screening Mammography to Detect Occult Malignancy in Autologous Breast Reconstructions: A 15-year Experience.
    Noroozian M; Carlson LW; Savage JL; Jeffries DO; Joe AI; Neal CH; Patterson SK; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2018 Oct; 289(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 30129903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Role of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening and Diagnostic Breast Imaging.
    Destounis S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 29317038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
    Tagliafico AS; Valdora F; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Houssami N; Calabrese M
    Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():92-96. PubMed ID: 29723697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Imaging: How Does It Fit into Preoperative Evaluation and Surveillance?
    Eghtedari M; Tsai C; Robles J; Blair SL; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2018 Jan; 27(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 29132564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.