151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292500)
1. An evaluation of online information available for women with breast implants aged 47-73 who have been invited to attend the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Parr O; Dunmall K
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 30292500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation Breast Cancer Information on The Internet in Arabic.
Alnaim L
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Aug; 34(4):810-818. PubMed ID: 29923058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Your patient information website: how good is it?
Soobrah R; Clark SK
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):e90-4. PubMed ID: 21883807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography Patient Information at Hospital Websites: Most Neither Comprehensible Nor Guideline Supported.
Sadigh G; Singh K; Gilbert K; Khan R; Duszak AM; Duszak R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Nov; 207(5):947-951. PubMed ID: 27610583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Ghodasra JH; Wang D; Jayakar RG; Jensen AR; Yamaguchi KT; Hegde VV; Jones KJ
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):272-278. PubMed ID: 28784239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer.
Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Informational Content and Readability of US Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.
Gagne SM; Fintelmann FJ; Flores EJ; McDermott S; Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Price MC; Stowell JT; Little BP
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1920431. PubMed ID: 32003825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
Cheng C; Dunn M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.
Jasem Z; AlMeraj Z; Alhuwail D
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 May; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35534816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
McInnes N; Haglund BJ
Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
