BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292500)

  • 21. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
    Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Available web-based dental implants information for patients. How good is it?
    Leira-Feijoo Y; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Blanco-Carrión J; Seoane J; Varela-Centelles P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1276-80. PubMed ID: 25041413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
    Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acute low back pain information online: an evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites.
    Hendrick PA; Ahmed OH; Bankier SS; Chan TJ; Crawford SA; Ryder CR; Welsh LJ; Schneiders AG
    Man Ther; 2012 Aug; 17(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 22464886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of Late-Life Depression Information on the Internet: Website Evaluation Study.
    Pryor TAM; Reynolds KA; Kirby PL; Bernstein MT
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Sep; 6(9):e36177. PubMed ID: 36094802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient-orientated web sites on laryngectomy: is their information readable?
    Pothier L; Pothier DD
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 19549174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Leading Orthopedic Academic Centers.
    Ryu JH; Yi PH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(9):E561-5. PubMed ID: 26641845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
    Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The quality and readability of internet information regarding clavicle fractures.
    Zhang D; Schumacher C; Harris MB
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 26775060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
    Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of online information to support patient decision-making in breast cancer surgery.
    Bruce JG; Tucholka JL; Steffens NM; Neuman HB
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 112(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 26417898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of English Websites on Dental Caries by Using Consumer Evaluation Tools.
    Blizniuk A; Furukawa S; Ueno M; Kawaguchi Y
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2016; 14(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 26973989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Usability of Patient Education-Oriented Cataract Surgery Websites.
    Lin MX; Li G; Cui D; Mathews PM; Akpek EK
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Apr; 131(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 37852419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MC; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):79-85.e3. PubMed ID: 27404964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.