288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292602)
1. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?
Bartal G; Sailer AM; Vano E
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 29471995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Get the Lead off Our Backs!
Rees CR; Duncan BWC
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29472000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The addition of a leaded arm sleeve to leaded aprons further decreases operator upper outer quadrant chest wall radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided interventions.
Ramanan B; Pizano A; Solano A; Gonugunta AS; Timaran CH; Siah M; Baig S; Shih M; Guild JB; Kirkwood ML
J Vasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 79(4):948-953. PubMed ID: 38040201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Aprons Be Properly Evaluated for Their Protective Quality without In-House Validation?
Weissenborn M; Heithaus E; Weir V; Onofrio A; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1933-1935.e2. PubMed ID: 27886959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel comprehensive radiation shielding system eliminates need for personal lead aprons in the catheterization laboratory.
Rabah M; Allen S; Abbas AE; Dixon S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Jan; 101(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 36453459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation Exposure Among Scrub Technologists and Nurse Circulators During Cardiac Catheterization: The Impact of Accessory Lead Shields.
Madder RD; LaCombe A; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Elmore M; Parker JL; Jacoby ME; Wohns D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29102573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation brain dose to vascular surgeons during fluoroscopically guided interventions is not effectively reduced by wearing lead equivalent surgical caps.
Kirkwood ML; Arbique GM; Guild JB; Zeng K; Xi Y; Rectenwald J; Anderson JA; Timaran C
J Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 68(2):567-571. PubMed ID: 29544995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-62. PubMed ID: 25771561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.
Mori H; Koshida K; Ishigamori O; Matsubara K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 24338033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel complete radiation protection system eliminates physician radiation exposure and leaded aprons.
Fattal P; Goldstein JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 22926976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.
Finnerty M; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1477-84. PubMed ID: 15789212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of lead aprons and their maintenance and management at our hospital.
Matsuda M; Suzuki T
J Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 26842670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
