288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292602)
21. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comprehensive radiation shield minimizes operator radiation exposure in coronary and structural heart procedures.
Rizik DG; Gosselin KP; Burke RF; Goldstein JA
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jul; 64():70-75. PubMed ID: 38538447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A New Design of a Lead-Acrylic Shield for Staff Dose Reduction in Radial and Femoral Access Coronary Catheterization.
Eder H; Seidenbusch MC; Treitl M; Gilligan P
Rofo; 2015 Oct; 187(10):915-23. PubMed ID: 26085177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation Protection for the Fluoroscopy Operator and Staff.
Meisinger QC; Stahl CM; Andre MP; Kinney TB; Newton IG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Oct; 207(4):745-754. PubMed ID: 27440524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Head and Neck Radiation Dose and Radiation Safety for Interventional Physicians.
Fetterly K; Schueler B; Grams M; Sturchio G; Bell M; Gulati R
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 28279321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Light-weight lead aprons--light on weight, protection or labelling accuracy?
Muir S; McLeod R; Dove R
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Jun; 28(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 16060320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Novel lead-free drape applied to the X-ray detector protects against scatter radiation in the angiography suite.
Irani Z; Alexander B; Zhang D; Liu B; Ghoshhajra B; Oklu R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1200-8. PubMed ID: 24985717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated.
Eder H
Rofo; 2023 Mar; 195(3):234-243. PubMed ID: 36796379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. LEAD COMPOSITE VS. NONLEAD PROTECTIVE GARMENTS: WHICH ARE BETTER? A MULTIVENDOR COMPARISON.
Peters SMB; Zweers D; de Lange F; Mourik JEM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):460-465. PubMed ID: 28074020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.
Guersen J; Cassagnes L; Mechin G; Ravel A; Dumousset E; Boyer L; Chabrot P
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):443. PubMed ID: 23433419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How protective are the lead aprons we use against ionizing radiation?
Oyar O; Kışlalıoğlu A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 22020951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of Attaching a Lead Drape to a Radioprotective Shield for CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures.
Hasegawa T; Shimizu H; Asai T; Furuya Y; Hattori H; Inaba Y
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2024 Jun; 35(6):936-938. PubMed ID: 38789207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting.
Etzel R; König AM; Keil B; Fiebich M; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():56-61. PubMed ID: 30150051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Invasive Cardiologists Are Exposed to Greater Left Sided Cranial Radiation: The BRAIN Study (Brain Radiation Exposure and Attenuation During Invasive Cardiology Procedures).
Reeves RR; Ang L; Bahadorani J; Naghi J; Dominguez A; Palakodeti V; Tsimikas S; Patel MP; Mahmud E
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 26292583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials.
König AM; Verbe Zoum J; Fiebich M; Abissi PW; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jul; 164():110862. PubMed ID: 37209465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Inspection of lead aprons: a practical rejection model.
Stam W; Pillay M
Health Phys; 2008 Aug; 95 Suppl 2():S133-6. PubMed ID: 18617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
