366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30292910)
1. SD-CNN: A shallow-deep CNN for improved breast cancer diagnosis.
Gao F; Wu T; Li J; Zheng B; Ruan L; Shang D; Patel B
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():53-62. PubMed ID: 30292910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.
Danala G; Patel B; Aghaei F; Heidari M; Li J; Wu T; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 29748869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversal of the hanging protocol of Contrast Enhanced Mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times.
van Geel K; Kok EM; Krol JP; Houben IPL; Thibault FE; Pijnappel RM; van Merriënboer JJG; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():62-68. PubMed ID: 31307654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria.
Lalji UC; Jeukens CR; Houben I; Nelemans PJ; van Engen RE; van Wylick E; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Paulis LE; Lobbes MB
Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):2813-20. PubMed ID: 25813015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value Added of Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.
Patel BK; Davis J; Ferraro C; Kosiorek H; Hasselbach K; Ocal T; Pockaj B
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(6):e1339-e1345. PubMed ID: 30122347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for breast cancer screening.
Chougrad H; Zouaki H; Alheyane O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():19-30. PubMed ID: 29477427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging.
Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Saab-Puong S; Iordache R; Muller S; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081907. PubMed ID: 23927321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening.
Aboutalib SS; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 24(23):5902-5909. PubMed ID: 30309858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
