These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30293184)
1. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up. Gönülol N; Kalyoncuoğlu E; Ertaş E; Misilli T Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 30293184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches. Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results. Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations. Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Ceballos L Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 23570300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin. Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial. Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-year prospective randomized study of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems in class II restorations. Mahmoud SH; Ali AK; Hegazi HA J Adhes Dent; 2014 Jun; 16(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 24779025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Evaluation of Silorane and Nano-hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities up to 3 Years. Öztürk-Bozkurt F; Toz T; Kara-Tuncer A; Gözükara-Bağ H; Özcan M Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 27589274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite. Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial. Türkün LS; Celik EU J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth. Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite. Popoff DA; de Magalhães CS; de Freitas Oliveira W; Soares LA; de Almeida Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Moreira AN; Mjör IA J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 25516879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations. Loguercio AD; Lorini E; Weiss RV; Tori AP; Picinatto CC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17432402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up. Gonçalves FS; Leal CD; Bueno AC; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS Am J Dent; 2013 Apr; 26(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24073532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The short-term clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in the proximal contacts of class II restorations. Goncalves FS; Castro CD; Bueno AC; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Magalhaes CS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 22917991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results. Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled trial of the 2-year clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in class 1 posterior restorations. Efes BG; Yaman BC; Gurbuz O; Gumuştaş B Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23724547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Marques IP; de Oliveira FBS; Souza JGS; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; França FMG; Popoff DAV Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques. Fahmy AE; Farrag NM J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]