291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30293247)
1. Virtual planning and navigational technology in reconstructive surgery.
Shenaq DS; Matros E
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 118(5):845-852. PubMed ID: 30293247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillomandibular Reconstruction Using Insourced Virtual Surgical Planning and Homemade CAD/CAM: A Single-Center Evolution in 75 Patients.
Vranckx JJ; Desmet O; Bila M; Wittesaele W; Wilssens N; Poorten VV
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul; 152(1):143e-154e. PubMed ID: 36728691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The state of virtual surgical planning in maxillary Reconstruction: A systematic review.
Chan TJ; Long C; Wang E; Prisman E
Oral Oncol; 2022 Oct; 133():106058. PubMed ID: 35952582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3- dimensional printing in head and neck oncologic surgery: A review and future directions.
Nyirjesy SC; Heller M; von Windheim N; Gingras A; Kang SY; Ozer E; Agrawal A; Old MO; Seim NB; Carrau RL; Rocco JW; VanKoevering KK
Oral Oncol; 2022 Sep; 132():105976. PubMed ID: 35809506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using an In-House Approach to Computer-Assisted Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Reconstruction of the Maxilla.
Numajiri T; Morita D; Nakamura H; Tsujiko S; Yamochi R; Sowa Y; Toyoda K; Tsujikawa T; Arai A; Yasuda M; Hirano S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 76(6):1361-1369. PubMed ID: 29294353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling.
Rodby KA; Turin S; Jacobs RJ; Cruz JF; Hassid VJ; Kolokythas A; Antony AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1171-85. PubMed ID: 24880575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed Tomographic Angiography Perforator Localization for Virtual Surgical Planning of Osteocutaneous Fibular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
Ettinger KS; Alexander AE; Arce K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 76(10):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 29730061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillofacial reconstruction using in-house virtual surgical planning.
Smithers FAE; Cheng K; Jayaram R; Mukherjee P; Clark JR
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):907-912. PubMed ID: 30070074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of 3D virtual surgical planning and computer aided design in reconstruction of maxillary surgical defects.
Glas HH; Vosselman N; de Visscher SAHJ
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Apr; 28(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 32102008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted design and computer-assisted modeling technique optimization and advantages over traditional methods of osseous flap reconstruction.
Matros E; Albornoz CR; Rensberger M; Weimer K; Garfein ES
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2014 Jun; 30(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 24323480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning and Manufacturing in Complex Mandibular Reconstruction.
Weyh AM; Quimby A; Fernandes RP
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Sep; 28(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32741511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Updates in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
Largo RD; Garvey PB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271e-285e. PubMed ID: 29068896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the benefit of virtual surgical planning on bony union rates in head and neck reconstructive surgery.
Sabiq F; Cherukupalli A; Khalil M; Tran LK; Kwon JJY; Milner T; Durham JS; Prisman E
Head Neck; 2024 Jun; 46(6):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 38545772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved Temporomandibular Joint Position After 3-Dimensional Planned Mandibular Reconstruction.
Sawh-Martinez R; Parsaei Y; Wu R; Lin A; Metzler P; DeSesa C; Steinbacher DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 27649463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staged Reconstruction (Delayed-Immediate) of the Maxillectomy Defect Using CAD/CAM Technology.
Pang JH; Brooke S; Kubik MW; Ferris RL; Dhima M; Hanasono MM; Wang EW; Solari MG
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2018 Mar; 34(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 29179225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Surgical Template for Guidance of Dental Implant Distraction in Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flaps.
Xingzhou Q; Wang Z; Ong HS; Chenping Z; Abdelrehem A
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(2):355-359. PubMed ID: 31934964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Analysis and Surgical Planning in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.
Steinbacher DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S40-56. PubMed ID: 26608154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning and Manufacturing in Complex Maxillary Reconstruction.
Breik O; Idle M; Martin T; Praveen P; Parmar S
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Sep; 28(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 32741512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of three-dimensional, CAD/CAM-assisted, virtual surgical simulation and planning in the pediatric craniofacial population.
Gray R; Gougoutas A; Nguyen V; Taylor J; Bastidas N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():163-169. PubMed ID: 28483229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Printed Fixation Tray for Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibular Free Flaps.
Arce K; Waris S; Alexander AE; Ettinger KS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 76(10):2211-2219. PubMed ID: 29802815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
