These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30293635)

  • 1. A statistic to avoid being misled by the "winners curse".
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 103():vi-viii. PubMed ID: 30293635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The STAR*D Trial: It Is Time to Reexamine the Clinical Beliefs That Guide the Treatment of Major Depression.
    Pigott HE
    Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Jan; 60(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 25886544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. STAR*D and Measurement-Based Care for Depression: Don't Toss Out the Baby!
    Lam RW; Kennedy SH
    Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Jan; 60(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 25886543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.
    Tai SS; Iliffe S
    Br J Sports Med; 2000 Jun; 34(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 10854027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
    Villar J; Carroli G
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines can improve wound care.
    Weller C; McNeil J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Aug; 19(8):347-53. PubMed ID: 20852507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Over-AVID subgroup analysis.
    Goldberger JJ; Parker MA; Kadish AH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Nov; 38(5):1586-7. PubMed ID: 11691549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The delayed-start study in Parkinson disease: can't satisfy everyone.
    Olanow CW; Rascol O
    Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1149-50. PubMed ID: 20368635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yes, size does matter!: Sample size calculations for randomised trials.
    Middleton L
    BJOG; 2020 Jul; 127(8):1016-1017. PubMed ID: 31910329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study.
    Eccles M; Grimshaw J; Steen N; Parkin D; Purves I; McColl E; Rousseau N
    Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 17(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 10758083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials.
    Wittes J
    Epidemiol Rev; 2002; 24(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 12119854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis.
    Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F;
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e305-7. PubMed ID: 15173053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Fujii Y
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of Reporting Nutritional Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.
    Daitch V; Babich T; Singer P; Leibovici L
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Aug; 63(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 26881412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Basics of designing a clinical trial: part I.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Sep; 27(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10999963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of data integrity.
    McCann JC; Hudes ML; Ames BN
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):1042-3. PubMed ID: 22861504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.