722 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30293688)
1. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin.
Unkovskiy A; Bui PH; Schille C; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Huettig F; Spintzyk S
Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e324-e333. PubMed ID: 30293688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of build orientation in accuracy, flexural modulus, flexural strength, and microhardness of 3D-Printed resins for provisional restorations.
de Castro EF; Nima G; Rueggeberg FA; Giannini M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105479. PubMed ID: 36279743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of printing orientation on physical and mechanical properties of 3D printing prosthodontic base resin materials].
Zhan X; Cao L; Xiang D; Tang H; Xia D; Lin H
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Apr; 56(2):345-351. PubMed ID: 38595256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexural Properties and Hardness of CAD-CAM Denture Base Materials.
Fouda SM; Gad MM; Abualsaud R; Ellakany P; AlRumaih HS; Khan SQ; Akhtar S; Al-Qarni FD; Al-Harbi FA
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 35567362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The anisotropicity of the flexural properties of an occlusal device material processed by stereolithography.
Väyrynen VO; Tanner J; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 27312654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations.
Shim JS; Kim JE; Jeong SH; Choi YJ; Ryu JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):468-475. PubMed ID: 31810611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel Low-Shrinkage Resin for 3D Printing.
Ling L; Taremi N; Malyala R
J Dent; 2022 Mar; 118():103957. PubMed ID: 35038476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104254. PubMed ID: 33333480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Printing Orientation and Postcuring Time on the Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Resins.
Al-Dulaijan YA; Alsulaimi L; Alotaibi R; Alboainain A; Akhtar S; Khan SQ; Al-Ghamdi M; Gad MM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):45-52. PubMed ID: 35902078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of surface finishing and printing layer orientation on surface roughness and flexural strength of stereolithography-manufactured dental zirconia.
Lu Y; Wang L; Dal Piva AMO; Tribst JPM; Nedeljkovic I; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jul; 143():105944. PubMed ID: 37269603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of printing orientation on mechanical properties of aged 3D-printed restorative resins.
Espinar C; Pérez MM; Pulgar R; Leon-Cecilla A; López-López MT; Della Bona A
Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):756-763. PubMed ID: 38429216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Printing Layer Thickness and Postprinting Conditions on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of a 3D-Printed Resin.
Alshamrani AA; Raju R; Ellakwa A
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():8353137. PubMed ID: 35237691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical properties, accuracy, and cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA.
Lin CH; Lin YM; Lai YL; Lee SY
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):349-354. PubMed ID: 31202550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Printing Accuracy and Flexural Properties of Different 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins.
Al-Qarni FD; Gad MM
Materials (Basel); 2022 Mar; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35407742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.
Tahayeri A; Morgan M; Fugolin AP; Bompolaki D; Athirasala A; Pfeifer CS; Ferracane JL; Bertassoni LE
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 29110921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the postpolymerization type and time on the flexural strength and dimensional stability of 3D printed interim resins.
Silva NR; Moreira FGG; Cabral ABC; Bottino MA; Marinho RMM; Souza ROA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 37659913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the physical and mechanical properties of 3D printed acrylic material for denture base application.
Altarazi A; Haider J; Alhotan A; Silikas N; Devlin H
Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1841-1854. PubMed ID: 36195470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology.
Alharbi N; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 27611757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the suitability of fused deposition modeling to produce acrylic removable denture bases.
Alanazi KK; Wood D; Shepherd J; Stokes CW; Asencio IO
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e880. PubMed ID: 38798134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
