98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30294559)
1. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 2: Density measurement.
du Plessis A; Sperling P; Beerlink A; Tshabalala L; Hoosain S; Mathe N; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1117-1123. PubMed ID: 30294559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis.
du Plessis A; Sperling P; Beerlink A; Tshabalala L; Hoosain S; Mathe N; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1102-1110. PubMed ID: 30271722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 4: Metal powder analysis.
du Plessis A; Sperling P; Beerlink A; du Preez WB; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1336-1345. PubMed ID: 30406023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness.
Plessis AD; Sperling P; Beerlink A; Kruger O; Tshabalala L; Hoosain S; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1111-1116. PubMed ID: 30294558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Looking deep into nature: A review of micro-computed tomography in biomimicry.
du Plessis A; Broeckhoven C
Acta Biomater; 2019 Feb; 85():27-40. PubMed ID: 30543937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deriving tissue density and elastic modulus from microCT bone scans.
Wagner DW; Lindsey DP; Beaupre GS
Bone; 2011 Nov; 49(5):931-8. PubMed ID: 21820094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-destructive wood identification using X-ray µCT scanning: which resolution do we need?
Dierickx S; Genbrugge S; Beeckman H; Hubau W; Kibleur P; Van den Bulcke J
Plant Methods; 2024 Jun; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 38915095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray microcomputed tomography for measuring polymerization shrinkage of polymeric dental composites.
Sun J; Lin-Gibson S
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 17572484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of bone microstructure in the wrist using cone-beam computed tomography.
Mys K; Stockmans F; Vereecke E; van Lenthe GH
Bone; 2018 Sep; 114():206-214. PubMed ID: 29909060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton.
Jiang Y; Zhao J; White DL; Genant HK
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2000 Sep; 1(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15758525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry for assessment of new bone formation in a calvarial experimental model.
Yeom H; Blanchard S; Kim S; Zunt S; Chu TM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 18362725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper.
Jensen MM; Jørgensen JT; Binderup T; Kjaer A
BMC Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 8():16. PubMed ID: 18925932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porosity imaged by a vector projection algorithm correlates with fractal dimension measured on 3D models obtained by microCT.
Chappard D; Stancu IC
J Microsc; 2015 Apr; 258(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25556606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unwrapping microcomputed tomographic images for measuring cortical osteolytic lesions in the 5T2 murine model of myeloma treated by bisphosphonate.
N'Diaye M; Libouban H; Aguado E; Bouvard B; Audran M; Chappard D
Micron; 2015 Jan; 68():107-114. PubMed ID: 25464148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of sampling patterns for high-resolution compressed sensing MRI of porous materials: 'learning' from X-ray microcomputed tomography data.
Karlsons K; DE Kort DW; Sederman AJ; Mantle MD; DE Jong H; Appel M; Gladden LF
J Microsc; 2019 Nov; 276(2):63-81. PubMed ID: 31587277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three dimensional imaging of paraffin embedded human lung tissue samples by micro-computed tomography.
Scott AE; Vasilescu DM; Seal KA; Keyes SD; Mavrogordato MN; Hogg JC; Sinclair I; Warner JA; Hackett TL; Lackie PM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126230. PubMed ID: 26030902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Different Parameter Sets Lead to Equivalent Optima between Geometric Accuracy and Mechanical Properties in Arburg Plastic Freeforming?
Eisele L; Heuer A; Weidenmann KA; Liebig WV
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 36987296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A calibration methodology of QCT BMD for human vertebral body with registered micro-CT images.
Dall'Ara E; Varga P; Pahr D; Zysset P
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2602-8. PubMed ID: 21776797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualization of woven bone structure through analysis of biopsy specimens using synchrotron radiation and conventional X-ray microcomputed tomography.
Seo SJ; Kim YG
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2020 Jan; 27(Pt 1):199-206. PubMed ID: 31868752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An improved segmentation method for in vivo microCT imaging.
Waarsing JH; Day JS; Weinans H
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1640-50. PubMed ID: 15355559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
