189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30295054)
1. Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Adolescent Community and Clinical Populations.
Vugteveen J; de Bildt A; Serra M; de Wolff MS; Timmerman ME
Assessment; 2020 Oct; 27(7):1476-1489. PubMed ID: 30295054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years.
Hoffmann MD; Lang JJ; Guerrero MD; Cameron JD; Goldfield GS; Orpana HM; de Groh M
Health Rep; 2020 Aug; 31(8):13-20. PubMed ID: 32816414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.
Maurice-Stam H; Haverman L; Splinter A; van Oers HA; Schepers SA; Grootenhuis MA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 29898729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study.
Rothenberger A; Becker A; Erhart M; Wille N; Ravens-Sieberer U;
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():99-105. PubMed ID: 19132309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the Arabic self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.
Emam MM; Abu Hilal MM; Kazem AM; Alkharousi SJ
Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Dec; 59():211-220. PubMed ID: 27636156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental health difficulties in children and adolescents: The study of the SDQ in the Spanish National Health Survey 2011-2012.
Ortuño-Sierra J; Aritio-Solana R; Fonseca-Pedrero E
Psychiatry Res; 2018 Jan; 259():236-242. PubMed ID: 29091822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity Aspects of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Adolescent Self-Report and Parent-Report Versions Among Dutch Adolescents.
Vugteveen J; de Bildt A; Theunissen M; Reijneveld SA; Timmerman M
Assessment; 2021 Mar; 28(2):601-616. PubMed ID: 31257902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for Spanish 5- to 17-Year-Olds.
Español-Martín G; Pagerols M; Prat R; Rivas C; Sixto L; Valero S; Artigas MS; Ribasés M; Ramos-Quiroga JA; Casas M; Bosch R
Assessment; 2021 Jul; 28(5):1445-1458. PubMed ID: 32449368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malaysian Parent Ratings of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Language Versions, Gender, Informants, and Race.
Gomez R; Stavropoulos V
Assessment; 2020 Dec; 27(8):1971-1984. PubMed ID: 30003809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric properties and normative data of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Latvian general adolescent population.
Bezborodovs Ņ; Krēgers R; Vētra L; Rancāns E; Villeruša A
Nord J Psychiatry; 2024 May; 78(4):301-311. PubMed ID: 38421351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric properties of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Ecuadorian context: an evaluation of four models.
Arias-Medina P
BMC Psychol; 2019 Aug; 7(1):51. PubMed ID: 31387636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement equivalence of the SDQ in Chinese Adolescents: A horizontal and longitudinal perspective.
Liang L; Yang J; Yao S
J Affect Disord; 2019 Oct; 257():439-444. PubMed ID: 31306994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.
Muris P; Meesters C; van den Berg F
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2003 Jan; 12(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12601558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher forms of the Japanese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Shibata Y; Okada K; Fukumoto R; Nomura K
Brain Dev; 2015 May; 37(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 25172302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.
Becker A; Wang B; Kunze B; Otto C; Schlack R; Hölling H; Ravens-Sieberer U; Klasen F; Rogge J; Isensee C; Rothenberger A; Bella Study Group T
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2018 Nov; 46(6):523-533. PubMed ID: 29846123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-specific norms and validation of the German SDQ parent version based on a nationally representative sample (KiGGS).
Janitza S; Klipker K; Hölling H
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2020 Feb; 29(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 31016398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire self-report-, parent-, and teacher version in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Kaiser S; Halvorsen MB
Res Dev Disabil; 2022 Apr; 123():104194. PubMed ID: 35149331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Utility of the Parent-Report Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Latvian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice.
Bezborodovs Ņ; Kočāne A; Rancāns E; Villeruša A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(11):. PubMed ID: 36363556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Across Ages 4 to 16 in the ALSPAC Sample.
Speyer LG; Auyeung B; Murray AL
Assessment; 2023 Sep; 30(6):1884-1894. PubMed ID: 36254666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is it time to revise the SDQ? The psychometric evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Kankaanpää R; Töttö P; Punamäki RL; Peltonen K
Psychol Assess; 2023 Dec; 35(12):1069-1084. PubMed ID: 37768636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
