These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30295147)
1. Confidence in accuracy moderates the benefits of retrieval practice. Zhang M; Chen X; Liu XL Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 30295147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text. Little JL; McDaniel MA Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. Hopper WJ; Huber DE Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice. Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing and metacognition: retrieval practise effects on metacognitive monitoring in learning from text. Barenberg J; Dutke S Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):269-279. PubMed ID: 30074864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals. Rowland CA; DeLosh EL Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrieval Practice Facilitates Judgments of Learning Through Multiple Mechanisms: Simultaneous and Independent Contribution of Retrieval Confidence and Retrieval Fluency. Chen X; Zhang M; Liu XL Front Psychol; 2019; 10():987. PubMed ID: 31130901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices. Toppino TC; Pagano MJ Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Item Difficulty Affect the Magnitude of the Retrieval Practice Effect? An Evaluation of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis. Lima MFR; Venâncio S; Feminella J; Buratto LG Span J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23():e31. PubMed ID: 32772963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues. Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1666-1674. PubMed ID: 31161529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material. Rowland CA; DeLosh EL Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24671778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects? Vaughn KE; Rawson KA; Pyc MA Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 23589200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of retrieval practice and presentation modality on verbal learning: testing the limits of the testing effect. Wilkinson AM; Hall ACG; Hogan EE Memory; 2019 Sep; 27(8):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 31234716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study. Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition. Jang Y; Wallsten TS; Huber DE Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of retrieval practice on metacognition: The contribution of analytic and non-analytic processes. Miller TM; Geraci L Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():41-50. PubMed ID: 26985881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty. Maddox GB; Balota DA Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):760-74. PubMed ID: 25616776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice. Racsmány M; Szőllősi Á; Marián M Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 32418183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reverse inference of memory retrieval processes underlying metacognitive monitoring of learning using multivariate pattern analysis. Stiers P; Falbo L; Goulas A; van Gog T; de Bruin A Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():11-23. PubMed ID: 26883066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The two processes underlying the testing effect- Evidence from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). Liu XL; Tan DH; Reder LM Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():77-85. PubMed ID: 29474894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]