856 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30295156)
1. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
Visram AS; Innes-Brown H; El-Deredy W; McKay CM
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():35-42. PubMed ID: 25959269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users.
Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users.
Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ
Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
Yang HI; Zeng FG
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness.
Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of list equivalency for Mandarin speech materials to use with cochlear implant listeners.
Li Y; Wang S; Su Q; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S31-S40. PubMed ID: 27414242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
