850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30295156)
21. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evidence of a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users.
Guiraud J; Besle J; Arnold L; Boyle P; Giard MH; Bertrand O; Norena A; Truy E; Collet L
J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 27(29):7838-46. PubMed ID: 17634377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Laurello SA
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.
Tejani VD; Carroll RL; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 384():107815. PubMed ID: 31678892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-term Average Speech Spectra of Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
Yüksel M; Gündüz B
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):255.e19-255.e25. PubMed ID: 29329722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.
Reiss LA; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Erenberg SR; Taylor J; Gantz BJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3406-17. PubMed ID: 23145621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
Plant K; Babic L
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.
Sagi E; Svirsky MA
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():316-328. PubMed ID: 30396747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.
Nelson DA; Kreft HA; Anderson ES; Donaldson GS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3916-33. PubMed ID: 21682414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current Focusing to Reduce Channel Interaction for Distant Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Programs.
DeVries L; Arenberg JG
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813811. PubMed ID: 30488764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old.
Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S39-44. PubMed ID: 27049835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recovery function of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Zhang F; Samy RN; Anderson JM; Houston L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):397-408. PubMed ID: 19928394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users.
Kranick M; Wagner L; Plontke S; Rahne T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 33297872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
