617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30295538)
1. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study.
Nodzo SR; Chang CC; Carroll KM; Barlow BT; Banks SA; Padgett DE; Mayman DJ; Jerabek SA
Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 30295538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Component Placement in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Redmond JM; Gupta A; Hammarstedt JE; Petrakos A; Stake CE; Domb BG
Orthopedics; 2016 May; 39(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 27064781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision of robotic guided instrumentation for acetabular component positioning.
Kanawade V; Dorr LD; Banks SA; Zhang Z; Wan Z
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Mar; 30(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 25453633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty.
Kyo T; Nakahara I; Kuroda Y; Miki H
Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 26290170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.
Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Wörner M; Völlner F; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27646313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assuring the long-term total joint arthroplasty: a triad of variables.
Kayani B; Konan S; Thakrar RR; Huq SS; Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1_Supple_A):11-18. PubMed ID: 30648491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty: postoperative efficacy evaluation.
Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Suzuki H; Ike H; Kubota S; Saito T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jul; 17():280. PubMed ID: 27412447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation?
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Gill HS; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1290-7. PubMed ID: 25274911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study].
Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 17534206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].
Von Recum J; Wendl K; Korber J; Wentzensen A; Grützner PA
Unfallchirurg; 2003 Nov; 106(11):929-34. PubMed ID: 14634736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of femoral component anteversion in robotic total hip arthroplasty.
Sugano N; Maeda Y; Fuji H; Tamura K; Nakamura N; Takashima K; Uemura K; Hamada H
Bone Joint J; 2024 Mar; 106-B(3 Supple A):104-109. PubMed ID: 38425294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CT-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
Fontalis A; Kayani B; Plastow R; Giebaly DE; Tahmassebi J; Haddad IC; Chambers A; Mancino F; Konan S; Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2024 Apr; 106-B(4):324-335. PubMed ID: 38555946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty via a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in the supine position improves the precision of cup placement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Tamaki Y; Goto T; Wada K; Omichi Y; Hamada D; Sairyo K
J Orthop Sci; 2024 Mar; 29(2):559-565. PubMed ID: 36801090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA.
Ryan JA; Jamali AA; Bargar WL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Jan; 468(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 19629609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image-based hip navigation.
Wentzensen A; Zheng G; Vock B; Langlotz U; Korber J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA
Int Orthop; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 14565684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
El Bitar YF; Jackson TJ; Lindner D; Botser IB; Stake CE; Domb BG
Orthopedics; 2015 Jan; 38(1):e31-7. PubMed ID: 25611417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.
Nawabi DH; Conditt MA; Ranawat AS; Dunbar NJ; Jones J; Banks S; Padgett DE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 23662346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does haptic robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty better restore native acetabular and femoral anatomy?
Tsai TY; Dimitriou D; Li JS; Kwon YM
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 25906764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
